<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1285">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Volumen 33 Número 4]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1293">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Editorial]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1283">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Clasificación del tubérculo suprameatal y análisis<br />
morfométrico con enfoque quirúrgico del hueso temporal]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Artículo Original]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Introducción: El hueso temporal es una estructura valiosa en el abordaje de patologías intracraneales a la fosa media y posterior,<br />
requiriendo en ocasiones la realización de petrosectomías anteriores, posteriores o abordajes combinados para la resección de<br />
tumores en dichas regiones. El propósito del presente estudio es realizar análisis morfométrico con enfoque quirúrgico del hueso<br />
temporal, en cráneos adultos, con énfasis en el tubérculo suprameatal (TSM) teniendo en consideración sus relaciones anatómicas.<br />
Material y métodos: El presente estudio se realizó en las instalaciones de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional<br />
Autónoma de México (UNAM). Se analizaron 200 huesos temporales de 100 cráneos humanos adultos. Se dio énfasis al TSM de<br />
acuerdo a su ubicación y tamaño, clasificándolo en: anterior medio o posterior y en tipo I (0-1 mm), tipo II (2-3 mm) y tipo III (&gt;3 mm).<br />
Además, se realizaron mediciones con enfoque quirúrgico de la porción petrosa del hueso temporal y de la cresta supramastoidea.<br />
Resultados: El TSM se observó en 171 especímenes estudiados (85.5%). Entre ellos, la posición posterior fue la más frecuente<br />
85 de 171 (49.70%), seguida de la posición media 43 (25.14%) y por último la posición anterior 43 (25.14%). En cuanto al<br />
tamaño, se encontró con mayor frecuencia el tipo II en 99 de los especímenes (49.5%), el tipo I en 82 especímenes (41%)<br />
y tipo III en 19 (9.5%). El asterion se reflejó dentro de la impresión de los senos en la mayoría 48.5%, la unión de la cresta<br />
supramastoidea con sutura escamosa se reflejaba en 98.5% de los casos a la fosa media.<br />
Discusión: En nuestra búsqueda de información no se cuenta con datos para realizar comparación con la obtenida en<br />
este estudio del tubérculo suprameatal, el hallazgo encontrado parece indicar que se encuentra una relación directa con la<br />
presencia de la impresión del surco del seno petroso superior. La distribución de acuerdo a su posición reviste importancia<br />
cuando se encuentra en grado III puesto que plantea una dificultad técnica, en abordajes como en petrosectomías, o bien, al<br />
cavum de Meckel desde un abordaje retrosigmoideo.<br />
Conclusión: La observación anatómica y clasificación que realizamos del tubérculo suprameatal, una estructura muy poco<br />
evaluada, nos da una consideración preoperatoria y transoperatoria cuando realizamos abordaje que involucra la cara<br />
posterior de la porción petrosa del hueso temporal]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:tableOfContents><![CDATA[Introduction: The temporal bone is a valuable structure in the approach of intracranial pathologies to the middle and posterior<br />
fossa. Sometimes requiring the performance of petrosectomies or combined approaches for the resection of tumors in these<br />
regions. The purpose of this study is to perform morphometric analysis in adult skulls with a surgical approach to the temporal<br />
bone, with emphasis on the suprameatal tubercle (SMT) taking into account their anatomical relationships.<br />
Material and methods: The present study was carried out in the facilities of the Faculty of Medicine of the National Autonomous<br />
University of Mexico (UNAM). 200 temporal bones from 100 adult human skulls were analyzed. The SMT was emphasized according to<br />
its location and size, classifying it as: anterior, middle, or posterior and type I (0-1 mm), type II (2-3 mm) and type III (&gt; 3mm). In addition,<br />
measurements were made with a surgical approach of the petrosal portion of the temporal bone and the supramastoid crest.<br />
Results: The SMT was observed in 171 specimens studied (85.5%). Among them, the posterior position was the most frequent<br />
85 of 171 (49.70%), followed by the middle position in 43 (25.14%) and finally the anterior position in 43 (25.14%). In terms of<br />
size, type II was more frequently found in 99 of the specimens (49.5%), type I in 82 specimens (41%) and type III were found in<br />
19 (9.5%). The asterion was reflected within the impression of the sinuses in the majority 48.5%, the union of the supramastoid<br />
crest with squamous suture was reflected in 98.5% of the cases to the middle fossa.<br />
Discussion: In our search for information, there is no data to make a comparison with that obtained in this study of the<br />
suprameatal tubercle. The findings seems to indicate that there is a direct relationship with the presence of the impression of<br />
the groove of the upper petrosal sinus. The distribution according to its position is important when it is in grade III since it poses<br />
a technical difficulty, in approaches such as petrosectomies, or approach to Meckel’s cave from a retrosigmoid approach.<br />
Conclusion: The anatomical observation and classification that we perform of the suprameatal tubercle, a very poorly evaluated<br />
structure, gives us a preoperative and transoperative consideration when we perform an approach that involves the posterior<br />
aspect of the petrosal portion of the temporal bone.]]></dcterms:tableOfContents>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Humberto Reyna Méndez]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Enrique López Berumen]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[ José Alfredo Espinosa Mora]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Alberto Manuel Angeles Castellanos]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Laura Matilde Ubaldo Reyes]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ignacio Mora Magaña]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Diego Méndez Rosito]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:dateAccepted><![CDATA[Septiembre 2019]]></dcterms:dateAccepted>
    <dcterms:dateSubmitted><![CDATA[Julio 2019]]></dcterms:dateSubmitted>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[BIBLIOGRAFÍA<br />
1. Blaser SI, Padfield N, Chitayat D, Forrest CR. Skull base<br />
development and craniosynostosis. 2015;45. doi:10.1007/s00247-<br />
015-3320-1.<br />
2. Bayraktar B, Polat G, Gurel I. Surgical Anatomy of the Temporal<br />
Bone and Measurements of the Skull Base for Transpetrosal<br />
Approaches. 1998;75(1):33-39.<br />
3. Rhoton AL. The Temporal Bone and Transtemporal Approaches.<br />
2000;47(3).<br />
4. Muren C. THE INTERNAL ACOUSTIC MEATUS Anatomic<br />
variations and relations to other temporal bone structures.<br />
1986;27(January):505-512.<br />
5. Peris-celda M, Perry A, Carlstrom P, Graffeo CS. Intraoperative<br />
Management of an Enlarged Suprameatal Tubercle During<br />
Microvascular Decompression of the Trigeminal Nerve , Surgical<br />
and Anatomical Description : 2-Dimensional. 2019;0(0):2019.<br />
doi:10.1093/ons/opz027.<br />
6. Day, J. Diaz, M.D.; Kellogg, Jordi X. MS., Fukushima, Takanori,<br />
M.D., D.M.Sc.; Giannotta, Steven L. MD, Department.<br />
Microsurgical Anatomy of the Inner Surface of the Petrous Bone:<br />
Neuroradiological and Morphometric Analysis as an Adjunct to<br />
the Retrosigmoid Transmeatal Approach Surgical Anatomy and<br />
Technique AUTHOR(S): 1994;34(6).<br />
BIBLIOGRAFÍA<br />
1. Seclen D, Salas E,Nuñez M, Mural M .Región petroclival. En: Campero A, Ajler P ed.Neuroanatomía Quirúrgica. Buenos Aires, Editorial<br />
Journal; 2019, 215-225.<br />
7. Adams Pérez J, Rassier Isolan G, Pires De Aguiar PH, Antunes AM.<br />
Volumetry and analysis of anatomical variants of the anterior portion<br />
of the petrous apex outlined by the Kawase triangle using computed<br />
tomography. J Neurol Surgery, Part B Skull Base. 2014;75(3):147-<br />
151. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1356491<br />
8. Fournier H-D, Mercier P, Roche P-H. Surgical anatomy<br />
of the petrous apex and petroclival region. 2008;32:91-146.<br />
doi:10.1007/978-3-211-47423-5_5.<br />
9. Altieri R, Sameshima T, Pacca P, et al. Detailed anatomy knowledge :<br />
first step to approach petroclival meningiomas through the petrous<br />
apex . Anatomy lab experience and surgical series. Neurosurg Rev.<br />
2016. doi:10.1007/s10143-016-0754-3.<br />
10. Peris-Celda M, Perry A, Carlstrom LP, Graffeo CS, Driscoll<br />
CLW, Link MJ. Key anatomical landmarks for middle fossa<br />
surgery: a surgical anatomy study. J Neurosurg. 2018:1-10.<br />
doi:10.3171/2018.5.jns1841.<br />
11. R. Chopra, N. Fergie, D. Mehta LL. The middle cranial fossa<br />
approach : an anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;(2002):348-<br />
351. doi:10.1007/s00276-002-0076-8.<br />
12. Pareschi R, Danesi G, Stefini R, Bivona R, Valera CI. The<br />
Transpetrosal Approaches System in Posterior Fossa Meningiomas<br />
Surgery : Rationale and Results. 2019.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1279">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Seguridad del tratamiento quirúrgico en aneurismas<br />
cerebrales no rotos, en la región de Coquimbo, Chile]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Artículo Original]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Introducción: El tratamiento microquirúrgico de los aneurismas cerebrales no rotos, ha demostrado ser seguro en distintas<br />
series, la indicación quirúrgica en estos casos es discutible y generalmente esta en relación a su riesgo de sangrado por<br />
características morfológicas y ubicación del aneurisma. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo, determinar si en nuestra región,<br />
el tratamiento microquirúrgico de los aneurismas cerebrales no rotos es seguro y así poder dar una recomendación de<br />
tratamiento a nuestros pacientes.<br />
Materiales y métodos: Treinta y un pacientes, 33 aneurismas cerebrales no rotos fueron tratados, En clínica Elqui y Hospital<br />
San Pablo de la Región de Coquimbo, entre mayo del 2017 y marzo del 2019, se hizo un seguimiento al total de los pacientes<br />
y se evaluó su resultado neurológico según la escala de Rankin modificado.<br />
Resultado: 97% de los pacientes obtuvieron un resultado neurológico favorable (Rankin &lt; 3), solo un 3% de los pacientes, un<br />
caso, obtuvo un resultado desfavorable (Rankin &gt; 2).<br />
Conclusión: El tratamiento microquirúrgico de los aneurismas cerebrales no rotos en nuestra región es seguro, obteniendo una<br />
muy baja morbilidad y 0% de mortalidad.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:tableOfContents><![CDATA[Introduction: The microsurgical treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms has been shown to be safe in different series,<br />
the surgical indication in these cases is debatable and is generally related to the risk of bleeding due to morphological<br />
characteristics and location of the aneurysm. The objective of this work is to determine if in our region the microsurgical<br />
treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms is safe and thus be able to give a recommendation of treatment to our patients.<br />
Materials and methods: 31 patients, 33 unruptured cerebral aneurysms were treated. At the Elqui clinic and San Pablo<br />
Hospital in the Coquimbo Region, between may 2017 and March 2019, the total number of patients was monitored and their<br />
Neurological outcome according to the modified Rankin scale.<br />
Result: 97% of the patients obtained a favorable neurological outcome (Rankin &lt;3), only 3% of the patients, one case, obtained<br />
an unfavorable outcome (Rankin&gt; 2).<br />
Conclusion: The microsurgical treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in our region is safe, obtaining a very low morbidity<br />
and 0% mortality.]]></dcterms:tableOfContents>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[José Tomas Hortal]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Jesús Garcia]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Iván Perales]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:dateAccepted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateAccepted>
    <dcterms:dateSubmitted><![CDATA[Mayo 2019]]></dcterms:dateSubmitted>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[1. Ajiboye, Norman, Nohra, Starke, Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms:<br />
Evaluation and Management. Scientific World Journal. 2015.<br />
954954.<br />
2. Britz GW, Salem L, Newell DW, Eskridge J, Flum DR. Impact of<br />
surgical clipping on survival in unruptured and ruptured cerebral<br />
aneurysms: a population-based study. Stroke. 2004. 35: 1399-1403.<br />
3. Brown R. D, Broderick J. P. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms:<br />
Epidemiology, natural history, management options, and familial<br />
screening. Lancet Neurology. 2014. 1: 393-404.<br />
4. Kotowski M, Naggara O, Darsaut TE, Nolet S, Gevry G,<br />
Kouznetsov E. Safety and occlusion rates of surgical treatment of<br />
unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta<br />
- analysis of the literature from 1990 to 2011. Journal Neurology<br />
Neurosurgery Psychiatry. 2013. 84: 42-48.<br />
5. Morgan MK, Wiedmann M, Assaad NN, Heller GZ. Complicationeffectiveness<br />
analysis for unruptured intracranial aneurysm surgery:<br />
a prospective cohort study. Neurosurgery. 2016. 78: 648-659.<br />
6. Naggara ON, White PM, Guilbert F, Roy D, Weill A, Raymond<br />
J. Endovascular treatment of intracranial unruptured aneurysms:<br />
systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on safety and<br />
efficacy. Radiology. 2010. 256: 887-897.<br />
7. Pandey A. S, Gemmete J. J, Wilson T. J, Chaudhary N, Thompson B.<br />
G, Morgenstern L. B, Burke J. F. High Subarachnoid Hemorrhage<br />
Patient Volume Associated with Lower Mortality and Better<br />
Outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2015. 77(3): 462–470.<br />
8. Raaymakers TW, Rinkel GJ, Limburg M, Algra A. Mortality and<br />
morbidity of surgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a metaanalysis.<br />
Stroke. 1998. 29: 1531-1538.<br />
9. Ruan C, Long H, Sun H, He M, Yang K, Zhang H. Endovascular<br />
coiling vs. surgical clipping for unruptured intracranial aneurysm: a<br />
meta-analysis. British Journal Neurosurgery. 2015. 29: 485-492.<br />
10. Spetzler R, McDougall C, Zabramski JM, Albuquerque F, Hills<br />
N, Russin J. The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 6-year results.<br />
Journal Neurosurgery. 2015. 123: 609-617.<br />
11. Thines L, Bourgeois P, Lejeune JP. Surgery for unruptured<br />
intracranial aneurysms in the ISAT and ISUIA era. Canadian<br />
Journal Neurological Sciences. 2012. 39:174-179.<br />
12. Whisnant J, Forbes G. International Study of Unruptured<br />
Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial<br />
aneurysms risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. New<br />
England Journal of Medicine. 1998. 339:1725-1733.<br />
13. Wiebers D. O, Whisnant J. P, Huston J. Unruptured intracranial<br />
aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical<br />
and endovascular treatment. The Lancet. 2003. 362: 103-110.<br />
14. Williams L. N, Brown R. D, Management of unruptured intracranial<br />
aneurysms. Neurology: Clinical Practice. 2013. 3: 99–108.<br />
15. Zheng J, Xu R, Guo Z, Sun X. Small ruptured intracranial<br />
aneurysms: the risk of massive bleeding and rebleeding. Neurological<br />
Research. 2019. 41: 1-7.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1284">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Utilización de las zonas de entrada seguras para el abordaje<br />
de lesiones intrínsecas de tronco cerebral en adultos]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Artículo Original]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Introducción: Las “zonas de entrada seguras” (ZES) al tronco cerebral describen accesos destinados a preservar estructuras<br />
críticas. La mayoría de las publicaciones son descripciones anatómicas; existiendo pocas sobre su aplicación. En este<br />
escenario, nuestro trabajo puede sumar información para el manejo quirúrgico en casos seleccionados.<br />
Material y Métodos: De una serie de 13 pacientes, se presentan 9 que no eran candidatos para biopsia estereotáctica y<br />
recibieron microcirugía. Las localizaciones fueron: mesencéfalo (3), tectum (1), protuberancia (2) y bulbo (3). Cinco pacientes<br />
tuvieron KPS =&gt; 70; y 4, KPS &lt;70. Diferentes ZES fueron utilizadas según la topografía lesional. El grado de resección se basó<br />
en la biopsia intraoperatoria y el monitoreo neurofisiológico.<br />
Resultados: Los hallazgos patológicos fueron: astrocitoma pilocítico (1), glioma de bajo grado (1), hemangioblastoma (1),<br />
subependimoma (1), disgerminoma (1), y lesiones pseudotumorales (3 cavernomas y 1 pseudotumor inflamatorio). El grado de<br />
resección fue completo (4), subtotal (3), y biopsia fue considerada suficiente en (2). Un paciente falleció en el postoperatorio.<br />
Discusión: Las lesiones del tronco cerebral son infrecuentes en adultos. Las controversias surgen cuando se balancean los<br />
beneficios de obtener diagnóstico histopatológico y los riesgos potenciales de procedimientos invasivos. La amplia variedad<br />
de hallazgos en esta localización exige una precisa definición histopatológica, que no solamente determinará la terapéutica<br />
adecuada, sino que advierte sobre las consecuencias potencialmente catastróficas de los tratamientos empíricos. Las ZES<br />
ofrecen un acceso posible y seguro, aunque es más realista considerarlas como áreas para abordar lesiones intrínsecas con<br />
baja morbilidad más que como zonas completamente seguras.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:tableOfContents><![CDATA[Introduction: The “safe entry zones” (SEZ) to the brainstem are special entrances described to preserve critical structures.<br />
Most publications correspond to anatomic research; few papers report their application in surgery. In this scenario, our report<br />
could add information to the surgical management in selected cases.<br />
Material and Methods: Out of a series of 13 patients, 9 were non-candidates for stereotactic biopsy and received<br />
microsurgery. Localizations of the lesions were: mesencephalus (3), tectal plate (1), pons (2) and medulla oblongata (3). Five<br />
patients had KPS =&gt; 70; 4, KPS &lt;70. Different SEZ were used according to lesional topography. The extent of resection were<br />
based on the frozen pathology findings and neurophysiological monitoring.<br />
Results: A variety of pathological findings were found: low-grade glioma (1); pilocytic astrocytoma (1); hemangioblastoma<br />
(1); subependimoma (1); disgerminoma (1); pseudotumoral lesions (cavernomas 3 and inflammatory pseudotumor 1). The<br />
extent of resection was complete (4), subtotal (3), and biopsy was considered sufficient in 2 cases. One patient died 96-hourspostoperative<br />
due to brainstem edema.<br />
Discussion: Brainstem structural lesions are uncommon in adults. Controversies arise regarding the need of histologic<br />
diagnosis, weighing benefits of a reliable diagnosis and the potential disadvantages of the invasive procedures. The accurate<br />
histopathological definition could not only determine an adequate therapy, but also can prevent the disastrous consequences<br />
of empiric treatments. The SEZ provides a feasible and safe access, although it is more realistic to consider them as areas to<br />
approach intrinsec lesions with less morbidity than to consider them as completely safe entrances.]]></dcterms:tableOfContents>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Alejandra T. Rabadán]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:dateAccepted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateAccepted>
    <dcterms:dateSubmitted><![CDATA[Julio 2019]]></dcterms:dateSubmitted>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[1. Ammirati M, Bernardo A, Musumeci A, Bricolo A. Comparison of<br />
different infratentorial supracerebellar approaches to the posterior<br />
and middle incisural spaces: a cadaveric study. J Neurosurg 2002; 97<br />
(4): 922-8.<br />
2. Boviatsis EJ, Kouyialis AT, Stranjalis G, Korfias S, Sakas DE.<br />
CT-guided stereotactic biopsies of brain stem lesions: personal<br />
experience and literature review. Neurol Sci 2003; 24: 97-102.<br />
3. Bricolo A, Turazzi S. Surgery for gliomas and other mass lesions<br />
of the brainstem. In: Bricolo A, Turazzi S, editors. Advances and<br />
technical standards in neurosurgery. New York (NY): Springer;<br />
1995. p. 261-341.<br />
4. Cavalcanti DD, Preul MC, Kalani MYS, Spetzler RF. Microsurgical<br />
anatomy of safe entry zones to the brainstem. J Neurosurg 2016;<br />
124:1359–1376.<br />
5. Chen X, Weigel D, Ganslandt O, Buchfelder M, Nimsky C.<br />
Diffusion tensor imaging and white matter tractography in patients<br />
with brain stem lesions. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2007; 149 (11):<br />
1117-31.<br />
6. Iwanaga J, Granger A, Vahedi P, Loukas M, Oskouian RJ, Fries<br />
FN, et al Mapping the internal anatomy of the lateral brainstem:<br />
anatomical study with application to far lateral approaches to<br />
intrinsic brainstem tumors. Cureus 2017; 9:2.<br />
7. Kondziolka D, Lundsford LD. Stereotactic biopsy for intrinsec<br />
lesions of the medulla through the long-axis of the brain stem:<br />
technical considerations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994; 129 (1-2):<br />
89-91.<br />
8. Kyoshima K, Sakai K, Goto T, Tanabe A, Sato A, Nagashima H,<br />
Nakayama J. Gross total surgical removal of malignant glioma from<br />
the medulla oblongata: report of two adult cases with reference to<br />
surgical anatomy. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2004; 11:1, 75-80.<br />
9. Massager N, Davi P, Goldman S. Combined magnetic resonance<br />
imaging and positron emission tomography-guided stereotactic<br />
biopsy in brainstem mass lesions: diagnostic yield in a series of 30<br />
patients. J Neurosurg 2000; 93: 951-957.<br />
10. Morota N, Deletis V. The importance of brainstem mapping<br />
in brainstem surgical anatomy before the fourth ventricle and<br />
implication for intraoperative neurophysiological mapping. Acta<br />
Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148: 499-509.<br />
11. Mursch K, Halatsch ME, Markakis E et al. Intrinsec brain stem<br />
tumors in adults: results of microneurosurgical treatment of 16<br />
consecutive patients. Br J Neurosurg 2005; 19 (2): 128-36.<br />
12. Rabadán AT, Campero A, Hernández D. Surgical application of the<br />
suboccipital subtonsillar approach to reach the inferior half of medulla<br />
oblongata tumors in adult patients. Front Surg. 2016 13, 2: 72.<br />
13. Rabadán AT, Hernández D. Importancia del diagnóstico<br />
histopatológico en el tratamiento de las lesiones del tronco cerebral<br />
en adultos. MEDICINA (Buenos Aires) 2018; 78: 305-310.<br />
14. Rachinger W, Grau S, Holtmannspotter M, Herms J, Tonn JC,<br />
Kreth FW. Serial stereotactic biopsy of brainstem lesions in adults<br />
impacting diagnostic accuracy compared with MRI only. J Neurol<br />
Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 1134-9.<br />
15. Recalde R, Figueiredo EG, de Oliveira E. Microsurgical anatomy of<br />
the safe entry zones on the anterolateral brainstem related to surgical<br />
approaches to cavernous malformations. Neurosurgery 2008;<br />
62:509-517.<br />
16. Rhoton A. The Rothon’s Collection. http://www.rothon.ineurodb.org.<br />
17. Sala F. A spotlight on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring<br />
of the lower brainstem. Clinical Neurophysiology 2017; 128 (2017)<br />
1369–1371 .<br />
18. Salmaggi A, Fariselli L, Milanesi I, Lamperti E, Silvani A, Bizzi<br />
A, et al. Natural history and management of brainstem gliomas in<br />
adults. A retrospective Italian study. J Neurol 2008; 255: 171-177.<br />
19. Schumacher M, Schulte-Monting J, Stoeter P, Warmuth-Metz<br />
M, Solymosi L (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging compared<br />
with biopsy in the diagnosis of brainstem diseases of childhood: a<br />
multicenter review. J Neurosurg 106: 111-119.<br />
20. Ziyal IM, Sehkar LN, Salas E, Subtonsillar-transcerebellomedullary<br />
approach to lesions involving the fourth ventricle, the<br />
cerebellomedullary fissure and the lateral brainstem. Br J Neurosurg<br />
1999 Jun;13(3):276-84.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1278">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Cirugía mínimamente invasiva en el tratamiento de<br />
fracturas tóracolumbares]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Artículo Original]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Objetivo: Analizar y describir una serie de fracturas tóraco-lumbares traumáticas tratadas con cirugía mínimamente invasiva.<br />
Material y métodos: Analizamos una serie de 26 pacientes con fracturas traumáticas tóraco-lumbosacras entre 2010-2017.<br />
Las imágenes pre-operatorias fueron clasificadas usando la clasificación AO. Analizamos en forma pre y post operatoria:<br />
escala visual analógica, volumen de pérdida sanguínea, duración de la hospitalización, complicaciones, cirugías asociadas en<br />
otros órganos, extracción de implantes en el largo plazo, estado neurológico pre y post quirúrgico y mortalidad.<br />
Los pacientes con historias clínicas completas, TAC pre-operatoria y un seguimiento mínimo de 12 meses fueron incluidos (18<br />
hombres y 8 mujeres). La edad promedio fue de 28.7 años (21-84 años); seguimiento promedio de 28 meses (13-86 meses).<br />
Dieciocho pacientes fueron manejados con instrumentaciones percutáneas, 8 recibieron vertebroplastias, y en 5 casos se<br />
realizó además algún gesto de artrodesis.<br />
Resultados: La EVA mejoró 7 puntos promedio respecto al pre-operatorio; el promedio de sangrado fue de 40 mL, no<br />
observamos ningún caso de empeoramiento neurológico. La duración promedio de la hospitalización fue de 3.9 días. Cuatro<br />
enfermos necesitaron alguna cirugía en otro órgano producto de sus politraumatismos.<br />
Los tornillos percutáneos fueron removidos en 9 casos luego de la consolidación. Como complicaciones tuvimos: 1 hematoma<br />
retroperitoneal autolimitado, una fractura pedicular y una cánula de cementación rota adentro de un pedículo.<br />
Conclusión: La cirugía mínimamente invasiva en trauma espinal es una alternativa válida que permite estabilización,<br />
movilización precoz y logra buenos resultados en términos de control del dolor con baja tasa de complicaciones]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:tableOfContents><![CDATA[Objective: To analyze and describe a series of trauma-related thoraco-lumbo-sacral vertebral fractures managed with minimally<br />
invasive surgery.<br />
Methods: We retrospectively review the charts and images of 26 patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures between 2010-2017.<br />
Pre-op images were assessed and fractures were classified according to the thoraco-lumbar trauma AO Spine classification. We<br />
analyzed pre and post-surgical visual analog scale (VAS), blood loss during surgery, hospital length of stay, complications, associated<br />
surgical procedures, long term post-op implant removal, pre and post neurological status and mortality.<br />
Patients with a complete case record, pre-op CT scans and minimum 12-month follow up were included (18 males and 8 females).<br />
Mean age was 28.7 years (21-84 years); mean post-op follow up was 28 month (13-86 months). Eighteen patients were managed<br />
with percutaneous instrumentation, 8 patients also received percutaneous vertebroplasty, and 5 patients underwent also some<br />
arthrodesis procedure.<br />
Results: VAS improved 7 points as compared to the pre-op score; mean blood loss was 40 mL, we did not observed any<br />
neurological deficit worsening. Mean hospital length of stay was 3.9 days. Four patients needed surgical procedures involving other<br />
organs due to politrauma.<br />
Percutaneous screws were removed in 9 cases after fracture consolidation. Complications were: one case of self-limiting<br />
retroperitoneal hematoma, one case of pedicle screw fracture and one cement broken cannula into the pedicle.<br />
Conclusion: Minimally invasive surgery in spine trauma is a valid option allowing stabilization, early mobilization, and leading to good<br />
outcomes in terms of pain control and a lower complication rate.]]></dcterms:tableOfContents>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Alfredo Guiroy]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[ Federico Landriel]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Alejandro Morales Ciancio]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Santiago Hem]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Alfredo Sícoli<br />
]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Nicolás Gonzalez Masanés]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[ Martín Gagliardi]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Claudio Yampolsky]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:dateAccepted><![CDATA[Junio 2019]]></dcterms:dateAccepted>
    <dcterms:dateSubmitted><![CDATA[Junio 2019]]></dcterms:dateSubmitted>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[1. Alander D, Cui S. Percutaneous pedicle screw stabilization: surgical<br />
technique, fracture reduction, and review of current spine trauma<br />
applications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018; 0:1-10.<br />
2. Bakhsheshian J, Dahdaleh N, Fakurnejad S, Scheer J, Smith Z. Evidencebased<br />
management of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic<br />
review of nonoperative management. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 37 (1):E1.<br />
3. Bose D, Tejwani NC. Evolving trends in the care of polytrauma patients.<br />
Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 2006; 37, 20-28.<br />
4. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of<br />
acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983;8:817–831.<br />
5. Hitchon P, Abode-Iyamah K, Dahdaleh N, Shaffrey C, Noeller J, He<br />
W, Moritani T. Nonoperative management in neurologically intact<br />
thoracolumbar burst fractures: clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine<br />
2016;41:483–489.<br />
6. Laghmouche N, Prost S, Farah K, Graillon T, Blondel B, Fuentes S.<br />
Minimally invasive treatment of thoracolumbar flexion-distraction fracture.<br />
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Apr;105(2):347-350.<br />
7. Landi A, Marotta N, Mancarella C, Meluzio M, Pietrantonio A, Delfini R.<br />
Percutaneous short fixation vs conservative treatment: comparative analysis<br />
of clinical and radiological outcome for A.3 burst fractures of thoracolumbar<br />
junction and lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2014; 23 (Suppl 6):S671–<br />
S676.<br />
8. Pape HC, Giannoudis P, Krettek C. The timing of fracture treatment in<br />
polytrauma patients: relevance of damage control orthopedic surgery. The<br />
American Journal of Surgery 183. 2002; 622–629.<br />
9. Pape H et al. The poly-traumatized patient with fractures: a multidisciplinary<br />
approach. 2016. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. DOI<br />
10.1007/978-3-662-47212-5_14.<br />
10. Resnik DK, Weller SJ, Benzel EC. Biomechanics of the thoracolumbar<br />
spine. Neurosurg Clin North Am 8:455-469, 1997.<br />
11. Rodríguez Boto G, Vaquero Crespo J. Traumatismo raquimedular. Pág 1-2.<br />
ISBN 978-84-7978-905-3.<br />
12. Scalea TM, Boswell SA, Scott JD, et al. External fixation as a bridge to<br />
intramedullary nailing for patients with multiple injuries and with femur<br />
fractures: damage control orthopaedics. J Trauma 2000;48: 613–23.<br />
13. Stahel P, VanderHeiden T, Flierl M, Matava B, Gerhardt D, Bolles G,<br />
Beauchamp K, Burlew C, Johnson J, Moore E. The impact of a standardized<br />
‘‘spine damage-control’’ protocol for unstable thoracic and lumbar spine<br />
fractures in severely injured patients: A prospective cohort study. J Trauma<br />
Acute Care Surg 590 Volume 74, Number 2.<br />
14. Tian F, Tu LY, Gu WF, Zhang EF, Wang ZB, Chu G, Ka H, Zhao J.<br />
Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw instrumentation in treatment of<br />
thoracic and lumbar spine fractures, a systematic review and metaanalysis.<br />
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12535.<br />
15. Vaccaro A, Oner C, Kepler C, Dvorak M, Schnake K et al. AOSpine<br />
Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System. Spine 2013;38:2028–<br />
2037.<br />
16. Wang X, Liu Y, Wang X, Chen H, Cao P, Tian Y, Wu X, Chen Y, Yuan<br />
W. Beneficial effects of percutaneous minimally invasive surgery for patients<br />
with fractures in the thoracic spine. Exp Ther Med. 2018 Dec;16(6):5394-<br />
5399.<br />
17. Yaszemski MJ, White AA, Panjabi MM. Biomechanics of the spine. En:<br />
Fardon DF, Garfin SR, Abitbol J-J, Boden SD, Herkowitz HN, Mayer TG<br />
(Eds.), Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Spine 2, American Academy of<br />
Orthopaedic Surgeons, Illinois, 2002, pp. 15-23, Cap. 3.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1277">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Tumor de plexo braquial con extensión cervico torácica<br />
en paciente pediátrico]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reporte de Caso]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Introducción: Los tumores de plexo braquial constituyen una entidad infrecuente. Cuando la lesión cumple con criterios<br />
quirúrgicos, el tratamiento ideal es la exéresis completa.<br />
Descripción del caso: Paciente pediátrica con antecedentes de neurofibromatosis que consulta por dolor leve y parestesias<br />
episódicas. Presenta masa palpable en región supraclavicular izquierda de consistencia duro elástica con signo de Tinel<br />
negativo. Se realiza una exéresis completa del neurofibroma mediante una cervicotomía anterior.<br />
Discusión: La indicación quirúrgica fue realizada en base al crecimiento tumoral y su efecto de masa sobre estructuras<br />
contiguas, los trastornos sensitivos y su antecedente de NF1, que predispone a variantes malignas. La clavícula suele ser el<br />
elemento anatómico que define las principales vías de abordaje al plexo braquial.<br />
Conclusión: Dejamos reportado un caso de neurofibroma de plexo braquial en una paciente pediátrica con neurofibromatosis.<br />
Describimos como la cervicotomía anterior fue una excelente vía a una masa extensión cervico torácica.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:tableOfContents><![CDATA[Introduction: Brachial plexus tumors are an infrequent entity. When the lesion meets surgical criteria, the ideal treatment is its<br />
complete removal.<br />
Case report: A pediatric patient with a history of neurofibromatosis consults for mild pain and episodic paresthesias. The patient<br />
presented to the hospital for an elastic palpable mass in the left supraclavicular region testing negative for Tinel&#039;s sign. Complete<br />
removal of the neurofibroma was performed through an anterior cervicotomy.<br />
Discussion: The surgical indication was made based on the growth of the tumor and its mass effect on contiguous structures, the<br />
patient’s sensory disorders and her neurofibromatosis history, which predisposes to malignant variants. The clavicle is usually the<br />
anatomical element defining the main approaches to the brachial plexus.<br />
Conclusion: The purpose of this article was to present a case of a of brachial plexus neurofibroma in a pediatric patient with<br />
neurofibromatosis. The anterior cervicotomy it would seem to be an excellent approach to a cervical thoracic extension mass.]]></dcterms:tableOfContents>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Jorge Luis Bustamante]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Nicolas Tello]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Lucas Hinojosa]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ariel Perelló]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Marcelo D’Agustini]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:dateAccepted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateAccepted>
    <dcterms:dateSubmitted><![CDATA[Marzo 2019]]></dcterms:dateSubmitted>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[1. Bandiera A, Negri G, Melloni G, Mandelli C, Gerevini S, Carretta A, et<br />
al. Management of Intrathoracic Benign Schwannomas of the Brachial<br />
Plexus. Case Rep Surg. 2014;2014:1-3.<br />
2. Courvoisier LG. Die Neurome eine Klinische Monographie. Basel,<br />
Switzerland: B Schwode; 1886.<br />
3. Das S, Ganju A, Tiel RI, Kline DG. Tumors of the brachial plexus.<br />
Neurosurg Focus 2007;22(6):1-6.<br />
4. Hirbe AC, Gutmann DH. Neurofibromatosis type 1: a multidisciplinary<br />
approach to care. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 834–43.<br />
5. Jia X, Yang J, Chen L, Yu C, Kondo T. Primary Brachial Plexus Tumors:<br />
Clinical Experiences of 143 Cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;148:91-5.<br />
6. Lee HJ, Kim JH, Rhee SH, Gong HS, Baek GH. Is surgery for brachial<br />
plexus schwannomas safe and effective?. Clin Orthop Relat Res.<br />
2014;472:1893-8.<br />
7. Lwu S, Midha R. Clinical examination of brachial and pelvic plexus tumors.<br />
Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22(6):1-5.<br />
8. Millan G, Casal D. Brachial plexus tumors in a tertiary referral center: a case<br />
series and literature review. Acta Reumatol Port. 2015;40:372-7.<br />
9. Oré Acevedo JF, La Torre Caballero M, Urteaga Quiroga R. Neurofibroma<br />
cervical pediátrico. Reporte de caso. An Fac med. 2016;77(3):287-9.<br />
10. Tschoe C, Holsapple JW, Binello E. Resection of primary brachial<br />
plexus tumor via a modified supraclavicular approach. J Neurol Surg Rep<br />
2014;75:133-5.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1280">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Neurocitoma central: a propósito de un caso]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reporte de Caso]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Introducción: El neurocitoma central fue descripto por primera vez en 1982 por Hassoun et al. Se trata de una neoplasia rara,<br />
bien diferenciada del sistema nervioso central de origen neuroectodermico, ubicado más comúnmente a nivel del sistema<br />
ventricular, típicamente adyacente al foramen de Monro. Cursa generalmente con síntomas de hipertensión intracraneal<br />
secundaria a hidrocefalia no comunicante. Afecta generalmente a adultos jóvenes, con edad de presentación media de 29<br />
años en las mayores series descriptas.<br />
Objetivos: Describir y presentar un caso de tumor cerebral específico, cuya importancia se da debido a su baja prevalencia y<br />
escasa casuística relatada en la literatura.<br />
Descripción del caso: En el presente artículo describimos un caso de una paciente de 35 años diagnosticada incidentalmente con<br />
una lesión ocupante de espacio a nivel del ventrículo lateral izquierdo redondeada, heterogénea, de bordes netos con dimensiones<br />
de 40x30x30 mm. La paciente fue intervenida quirúrgicamente para su resección. Se realizó abordaje interhemisférico transcalloso<br />
homolateral. Sin intercurrencias post-quirúrgicas fue dada de alta 4 días luego de la cirugía. El informe anatomo-patológico<br />
demostró tratarse de un Neurocitoma Central. Se comparó nuestro caso con lo descripto en la literatura.<br />
Conclusión: El neurocitoma central a pesar de no ser una patología prevalente, debe ser conocido en profundidad por los<br />
neurocirujanos, ya que su correcto manejo afecta directamente al pronóstico de los pacientes.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:tableOfContents><![CDATA[Introduction: The central neurocytoma was first described in 1982 by Hassoun et al. It is a rare, well-differentiated neoplasm<br />
of the central nervous system of neuroectodermal origin, located most commonly at the level of the ventricular system,<br />
typically adjacent to the foramen of Monro. It usually presents with symptoms of intracranial hypertension secondary to noncommunicating<br />
hydrocephalus. It generally affects young adults, with an average age of presentation of 29 years in the largest<br />
series described.<br />
Objetives: Describe and present one case of specific brain tumor, which is important due to its your low prevalence and scarce<br />
casuistic in the literature.<br />
Case presentation: In the present article, we describe a case of a female 35-year-old patient diagnosed incidentally with<br />
a heterogeneus rounded space-occupying lesion at the level of the left lateral ventricle, with net edges and dimensions of<br />
40x30x30mm. The patient was surgically intervened for tumoral resection. We opteded to use a homolateral transcallosal<br />
interhemisferic approach. Without post-surgical complications, she was discharged 4 days after surgery. The anatomopathological<br />
report proved to be a Central Neurocytoma. We compared our case with the existing publications.<br />
Conclusion: Despite being an uncommon tumor, Central Neurocytoma must be well understood by every neurosurgeon,<br />
considering that its adequated management influences the patient´s prognosis directly.]]></dcterms:tableOfContents>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Wellerson Sabat Rodrigues]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Matias Baldoncini]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Maria V. Montero]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Maximiliano Zarco]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Luciana Perren]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[ Agustin Conde]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[ Santiago Giusta]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:dateAccepted><![CDATA[Julio 2019]]></dcterms:dateAccepted>
    <dcterms:dateSubmitted><![CDATA[Mayo 2019]]></dcterms:dateSubmitted>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[1. Baldoncini Matias et al. Anatomia microquirúrgica y abordajes al central<br />
core cerebral. REV ARGENT NEUROC 2019 VOL. 33, N° 1: 1-13.<br />
2. Figarella-Branger D, Söylemezoglu F, Kleihues P, Hassoun J. Cantral<br />
neurocytoma. In Kleihues P, Cavenee WK. (ed). Pathology and genetics of<br />
tumours of the nervous system. Lyon: IARCPress, 2000:107-109.<br />
3. Hanel, Ricardo Alexandre et al. Neurocitoma central com apresentação<br />
incomum por hemorragia intraventricular: relato de caso. Arq. Neuro-<br />
Psiquiatr. [online]. 2001, vol.59, n.3ª.<br />
4. Hassoun J, Gambarelli D, Grisoli F, Pellet W, Salamon G, Pelliser JF, Toga<br />
M. Central neurocytoma. An electron-microscopic study of two cases. Acta<br />
Neuropathol 1982;56:151-156.<br />
5. Hassoun J, Söylemezoglu F, Gambarelli D, Figarella Branger D, von<br />
Ammon K, Kleihues P. Central neurocytoma: a synopsis of clinical and<br />
histological features. Brain Patholology 1993;3:297-306.<br />
6. Katati MJ, Vílchez R, Ros B, Horcajadas A, Arráez MA, Arjona V. Central<br />
neurocytoma: analysis of three cases and review of the literature. Rev Neurol<br />
1999;28:713-717.<br />
7. Koeller KK, Sandberg GD. From the archives of the AFIP. Cerebral<br />
intraventricular neoplasms: radiologic-pathologic correlation.<br />
Radiographics. 22 (6): 1473-505.<br />
8. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK &quot;WHO Classification<br />
of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. 4th Edition Revised&quot; ISBN:<br />
9789283244929.<br />
9. Mackenzie IR. Central Neurocytoma: histologic atypia, proliferation<br />
potential, and clinical outcome. Cancer. 1999 Apr 1;85(7):1606-10.<br />
10. Nishio S, Morioka T, Suzuki S, Fukui M. Tumours around the foramen of<br />
Monro: clinical and neuroimaging features and their differential diagnosis. J<br />
Clin Neurosci 2002; 9:137-141.<br />
11. Rades D, Fehlauer F. Treatment options for central neurocytoma.<br />
Neurology 2002;59:1268-1270.<br />
12. Robbins P, SegalA, Narula S, et al. Central neurocytoma: a<br />
clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of 7<br />
cases. Pathol Res Pract 1995;191:100-111.<br />
13. Smith A, Smirniotopoulos J, Horkanyne-Szakaly I. From the Radiologic<br />
Pathology Archives: Intraventricular Neoplasms: Radiologic-Pathologic<br />
Correlation. Radiographics. 2013;33 (1): 21-43.<br />
14. Schild SE, Scheithauer BW, Haddock MG, Schiff D, Burger PC, Wong<br />
WW, Lyons MK. Central neurocytomas. Cancer 1997;79:790-795.<br />
15. Zhang B, Luo B, Zhang Z, Sun G, Wen J. Central neurocytoma:<br />
a clinicopathological and neuroradiological study.Neuroradiology<br />
2004;46:888-895.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1287">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Experiencia con la “técnica de Xiao” para reinervación<br />
de la vejiga, en pacientes con mielomeningocele y vejiga<br />
neurogénica, 8 años de seguimiento, en adultos<br />
Premio Senior. XV Jornadas Argentinas de Neurocirugía de AANC]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Trabajos Premiados]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Objetivo: Restaurar función de vaciado vesical en pacientes con vejiga neurogénica por medio de la reinervación de la vejiga a<br />
través de la creación de reflejo sómato-visceral. Registrar complicaciones neuroquirúrgicas, urológicas y ortopédicas.<br />
Evaluar dificultades técnico-quirúrgicas y los resultados de 5 casos realizados en Argentina.<br />
Introducción: La vejiga neurogénica es una complicación secundaria al daño neurológico en los pacientes con<br />
mielomeningocele (MMC). Para lograr vaciar la vejiga deben realizar cateterismo intermitente. La técnica Xiao se basa en<br />
permitir la generación de un arco reflejo somato visceral por medio de una anastomosis entre una raíz eferente donante y la<br />
raíz motora S2 S3 que permita el vaciado vesical sin cateterismo.<br />
Material y métodos: Por medio de un estudio descriptivo retrospectivo, se analizan los<br />
resultados obtenidos luego de realizar la técnica Xiao, en el año 2010, en 5 pacientes con MMC y vejiga neurogénica. Los<br />
pacientes fueron operados en el Instituto de Rehabilitación (IREP). Fueron evaluados en forma multidisciplinaria tanto pre<br />
como en el postoperatorio por neurocirujanos, neurólogos, urólogos, clínicos y kinesiólogos.<br />
Resultados: Los pacientes que presentaron mejores resultados fueron los más jóvenes y los que no presentaban daño<br />
estructural de la vejiga al momento de la cirugía, lo que coincide con los resultados compartidos por los demás centros donde<br />
fue realizada esta técnica.<br />
Conclusiones: La técnica de Xiao puede considerarse una opción para el tratamiento de la vejiga neurogénica. Aunque nuestra<br />
serie es muy pequeña para dar conclusiones, los resultados globales de todas las series muestran resultados alentadores.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:tableOfContents><![CDATA[Objective: To restore bladder function in patients with neurogenic bladder through the reinnervation through restauration<br />
of somatic-visceral reflex. Record neurosurgical, urological and orthopedic complications. To evaluate technical-surgical<br />
difficulties and the results of 5 cases performed in Argentina.<br />
Introduction: Neurogenic bladder is a complication secondary to neurological damage in patients with myelomeningocele<br />
(MMC). To achieve emptying of the bladder, intermittent catheterization must be performed. The “Xiao technique” is based on<br />
allowing the generation of a visceral somatic-reflex arc by means of an anastomosis between a donor efferent root and the<br />
motor root S2-S3 that allows bladder emptying without catheterization.<br />
Material and methods: Through a retrospective descriptive study, the results obtained after performing the “Xiao technique”<br />
in 5 patients with MMC and neurogenic bladder were analyzed. The patients were operated at the Rehabilitation Institute<br />
(IREP). They were evaluated with a multidisciplinary team, both pre and post-surgery. The team was formed by neurosurgeons,<br />
neurologists, urologists, clinicians and kinesiologists.<br />
Results: The patients who presented the best results were the youngest and those who did not present structural damage of<br />
the bladder at the time of surgery, which match the results shared by the other centers where this technique was performed.<br />
Conclusions: “Xiao&#039;s technique” can be considered an option for the treatment of neurogenic bladder. Although our series is<br />
too small to make conclusions, the overall results of all the series show encouraging results.]]></dcterms:tableOfContents>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Beatriz Mantese]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[ Romina Argañaraz]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Enrique Turina]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Cristian Sager]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Martin Segura]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Fernando Ford]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:dateAccepted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateAccepted>
    <dcterms:dateSubmitted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateSubmitted>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[1. Amarenco G, Sheikh Ismaël S, Chesnel C, Charlanes A, LE Breton<br />
F. Diagnosis and clinical evaluation of neurogenic bladder. Eur J<br />
Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):975- 980.<br />
2. Bodner DR. How electrical stimulatio improves micturion.<br />
Contemporary Urol 1990;3:39- 45.<br />
3. Borgstedt-Bakke JH, Fenger-Grøn M, Rasmussen MM. Correlation<br />
of mortality with lesion level in patients with myelomeningocele: a<br />
population-based study. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Feb;19(2):227-<br />
231.<br />
4. Brindley G S, Polkey C E, Rushton D N. Sacral anterior root<br />
stimulator for bladder control in paraplegia: the first 50 cases. J<br />
Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.1986;49: 1004–1011.<br />
5. Carr MC. Neuropathic bladder in the neonate. Clin Perinatol. 2014<br />
Sep;41(3):725-33.<br />
6. Hald T, Agrawal G, Kantrowitz A. Studies in stimulation of the<br />
bladder and its motor nerves. Surg. 1966;60:848-56.<br />
7. Hold T, Agrawal G, Kantrowitz A. Studies in stimulation of the<br />
bladder and its motor nerves. Surg. 1966;60: 848–853.<br />
8. Jonas U, Henie JP, Tanagho EA. Studies on the feasibility of urinary<br />
bladder evacuation by direct spinal cord stimulation. Parameters of<br />
must effective stimulation. Invest Urol 1975;13:142-5.<br />
9. Kenneth Peters, Feber KM, Bennett RC. Sacral versus pudendal<br />
nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: a prospective, singleblinded,<br />
randomized, crossover trial. Neurourol Urodyn.<br />
2005;24(7):643-7.<br />
10. Kenneth Peters, Holly Gilmer, Kevin Feber. Us Pilot study of<br />
Lumbar to Sacral Nerve Rerouting to Restore Voiding and Bowel<br />
Function in Spina Bifida. Adv Urol. 2014;2014:863209.<br />
11. Vorstam B, Schlossberg S M, Kass L, Devince J. Urinary bladder<br />
reinnervation. J Urol.1986;136: 964–969.<br />
12. Vorstam B, Schlossberg S M, Kass L. Investigation on urinary<br />
bladder reinnervation: historical perspective and review. Urol.<br />
1987;30: 89–96.<br />
13. Xiao CG, de Groat WC, Godec CJ, Dai C, Xiao Q. “Skin-CNSbladder”<br />
reflex pathway for micturition after spinal cord injury and<br />
its underlying mechanisms. J Urol 1999;162:936- 42.<br />
14. Xiao CG, et al. An artificial somatic-autonomic reflex pathway<br />
procedure for bladder control in children with spina bifida. J Urol<br />
2005; 173:2112-6.<br />
15. Xiao CG, Schlossberg SM, Morgan CW, Kodama R. A posible new<br />
reflex pathway for micturition after spinal cord injury. J urol 1990;<br />
143:356.<br />
16. Xiao, CG., Du, M.-X., Dai, C., Li, B., Nitti, V.W. and de Groat,<br />
W. C.: An artifcial somatic- central nerous system-autonomic<br />
reflex pathway for controllable micturion after spinal cord injury:<br />
preliminary results in 15 patients. J Urol. 2003; 170: 1237.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1290">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Cirugía de oberlin en parálisis braquial obstétrica.<br />
Nota técnica<br />
Premio Junior. XV Jornadas Argentinas de Neurocirugía 2019]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Trabajos Premiados]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Introducción: La parálisis braquial obstétrica (PBO) constituye una complicación poco frecuente del parto. La mayoría de<br />
los pacientes recuperan espontáneamente, sin embargo en algunos casos debe realizarse una neurocirugía para reinervar<br />
músculos y restablecer funciones. Las ramas mayoritariamente afectadas son C5-C6. Oberlin describió por primavera vez un<br />
tipo de trasferencia nerviosa en 4 pacientes adultos, utilizando fascículos del nervio ulnar para reanimar el músculo bíceps. El<br />
objetivo de este trabajo consiste en realizar una nota técnica sobre la cirugía de Oberlin, en el contexto de una PBO. Esta nota<br />
técnica surge del análisis de 4 cirugías pediátricas y de las disecciones de 14 miembros superiores fetales.<br />
Descripción técnica: Paciente en decúbito dorsal, con el brazo afectado extendido, en supinación y abducción de 90°. Se<br />
incide piel 4cm de extensión en cara interna del brazo, hasta identificar la fascia braquial. Posteriormente se diseca la rama<br />
motora del bíceps y fascículos del ulnar. Mediante magnificación se aproximan los cabos y se realiza la neurorrafia.<br />
Discusión: Existen múltiples técnicas descriptas de transferencia nerviosa, escasa es la bibliografía en pacientes pediátricos.<br />
La cirugía de Oberlin puede ser realizada en pediatría.<br />
Conclusión: Presentamos los pasos de la cirugía de transferencia nerviosa descripta por Oberlin, la misma es reproducible<br />
en pacientes lactantes en contexto de PBO, quedando expuestos los detalles técnicos y los reparos anatómicos para su<br />
realización.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:tableOfContents><![CDATA[Introduction: Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) is a rare complication of labor. Most patients recover spontaneously,<br />
however, in some cases neurosurgery must be perform to re innervate muscles and restore functions. The most frequent<br />
affected roots are C5-C6. Oberlin first described a type of nervous transfer in 4 adult patients, using fascicles of the ulnar nerve<br />
to reanimate the biceps muscle. The objective of this paper is to make a technical note about Oberlin&#039;s surgery regarding<br />
OBPP. This technical note emerges from the analysis of 4 pediatric surgeries and 14 fetal upper limbs dissections.<br />
Technical description: Patient was place in dorsal decubitus, with the compromised upper limb extended in supination and<br />
90 ° abduction. Skin incision of 4 cm long is made along the medial aspect of the arm, until the brachial fascia is identified.<br />
Subsequently, the motor branch of the biceps muscle and fascicles of the ulnar nerve are dissect. Under microscopic<br />
magnification, both nerves are approached and the neurorrhaphy is performed.<br />
Discussion: There are multiple nerve transfer techniques described; but bibliography in pediatric patients is limited. Oberlin<br />
surgery can be performed in pediatrics.<br />
Conclusion: The steps of the nerve transfer surgery described by Oberlin presented can be applied in the case of obstetrical<br />
brachial plexus palsy, the technical details and the anatomical repairs for its realization are outlined.]]></dcterms:tableOfContents>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Luciano Grisotto]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Jorge Luis Bustamante]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalo Colombo]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[ Carolina Maldonado<br />
]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Nicolas Tello]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Fernando Torres]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:dateAccepted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateAccepted>
    <dcterms:dateSubmitted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateSubmitted>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[1. Al-Qattan MM. Oberlin&#039;s ulnar nerve transfer to the biceps nerve in<br />
Erb&#039;s birth palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(1):405-7.<br />
2. Apel PJ, Garrett JP, Sierpinski P, Ma J, Atala A, Smith TL, Koman<br />
LA, Van Dyke ME. Peripheral nerve regeneration using a keratinbased<br />
scaffold: long-term functional and histological outcomes in a<br />
mouse model. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(9):1541-7.<br />
3. Arzillo S, Gishen K, Askari M. Brachial plexus injury: treatment<br />
options and outcomes. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(4):1200-6.<br />
4. Atkins S, Smith KG, Loescher AR, Boissonade FM, O&#039;Kane S,<br />
Ferguson MWJ, Robinson PP. Scarring impedes regeneration at<br />
sites of peripheral nerve repair. Neuroreport. 2006;17(12):1245-9.<br />
5. Bahm J,Ocampo-Pavez C, Noaman H. Microsurgical technique in<br />
obstetric brachial plexus repair: a personal experience in 200 cases<br />
over 10 years. J Brachial PlexPeripher Nerve Inj. 2007;2(1):1.<br />
6. Bahm J, Gkotsi A, Bouslama S, El-Kazzi W, Schuind F. Direct<br />
Nerve Sutures in (Extended) Upper Obstetric Brachial Plexus<br />
Repair. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj. 2017;12(1):17-20.<br />
7. Burnett MG, Zager EL. Pathophysiology of peripheral nerve injury:<br />
a brief review. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;16(5):E1.<br />
8. Bustamante JL. Estudio comparativo de la reparación del sistema<br />
nervioso periférico con técnicas microquirúrgicas experimentales de<br />
sutura epineural en condiciones de distintos grados de tensión. [Tesis<br />
de doctorado en ciencias médicas]. La Plata: Universidad Nacional<br />
de La Plata; 2015.<br />
9. Chang KWC, Thomas JW, Popadich M, Brown SH, Chung KC,<br />
Yang LJS. Oberlin transfer compared with nerve grafting for<br />
improving early supination in neonatal brachial plexus palsy. J<br />
Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;21(2):178-84.<br />
10. Chin Chuang DC, Mardini S, Ma HS. Surgical Strategy for Infant<br />
Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Palsy: Experiences at Chang Gung<br />
Memorial Hospital. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(1):132-42.<br />
11. Dahlin LB. Techniques of peripheral nerve repair. Scand J Surg.<br />
2008;97(4):310-6.<br />
12. Davidge KM, Clarke HM, Borschel GH. Nerve Transfers in Birth<br />
Related Brachial Plexus Injuries: Where Do We Stand? Hand Clin.<br />
2016;32(2):175-90.<br />
13. El-Gammal TA, El-Sayed A, Kotb MM, Ragheb YF, Saleh<br />
WR, Elnakeeb RM, El-Sayed Semaya A. Total obstetric brachial<br />
plexus palsy: results and strategy of microsurgical reconstruction.<br />
Microsurgery. 2010;30(3):169-78.<br />
14. FigueiredoRdeM, Grechi G, GeppRdeA. Oberlin’s procedure in<br />
children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy. Childs Nerv Syst.<br />
2016;32(6):1085-91.<br />
15. Flores AJ, Lavernia CJ, Owens PW. Anatomy and physiology of<br />
peripheral nerve injury and repair. Am J Orthop.2000;29(3):167–73.<br />
16. Geneser F. Histología. 2da ed. Panamericana EM, editor. 1990. p.<br />
283–5.<br />
17. Ghanghurde BA, Mehta R, Ladkat KM, Raut BB, Thatte MR.<br />
Distal transfer as a primary treatment in obstetric brachial plexus<br />
palsy: a series of 20 cases. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016;41(8):875-81.<br />
18. Griffin JW, Hogan MaC, Chhabra AB, Deal DN. Peripheral<br />
Nerve Repair and Reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am.<br />
2013;95(23):2144-51.<br />
19. Hale HB, Bae DS, Waters PM. Current concepts in the management<br />
of brachial plexus birth palsy. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(2):322-31.<br />
20. Heise CO, Siqueira MG, Martins RS, Foroni LH, Sterman-Neto H.<br />
Distal nerve transfer versus supraclavicular nerve grafting: comparison<br />
of elbow flexion outcome in neonatal brachial plexus palsy with C5-<br />
C7 involvement. Childs Nerv Syst. 2017;33(9):1571-4.<br />
21. Kechele PR, Bertelli JA, Dalmarco EM, Frode TS. The mesh repair:<br />
tension free alternative on dealing with nerve gaps-experimental<br />
results. Microsurgery. 2011;31(7):551–8.<br />
22. Kliegman RM, Stanton B, Geme J, Schor NF. Nelson: Tratado de<br />
pediatría, 20° edición. Elsevier, 2016.<br />
23. Kozin SH. Nerve transfers in brachial plexus birth palsies: indications,<br />
techniques, and outcomes. Hand Clin. 2008;24(4):363-76.<br />
24. Ladak A, Morhart M, O’Grady K, Wong JN, Chan KM, Watt MJ,<br />
Olson JL. Distal Nerve Transfers Are Effective in Treating Patients<br />
with Upper Trunk Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Injuries: An Early<br />
Experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(6):985-92.<br />
25. Laurent JP, Lee R, Shenaq S, Parke JT, Solis IS, Kowalik L.<br />
Neurosurgical correction of upper brachial plexus birth injuries. J<br />
Neurosurg. 1993;79(2):197-203.<br />
26. Leechavengvons S, Witoonchart K, Uerpairojkit C, Thuvasethakul<br />
P, Malungpaishrope K. Combined nerve transfer for C5 and C6<br />
brachial plexus avulsion injury. J Hand Surg Am.2006;31(2):183-9.<br />
27. Leechavengvons S, Witoonchart K, Uerpairojkit C, Thuvasethakul<br />
P, Ketmalasiri W. Nerve transfer to biceps muscle using part of the<br />
ulnar nerve in brachial plexus injury (upper arm type): A report of 32<br />
cases. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23(4):711-6.<br />
28. Little KJ, Zlotolow DA, Soldado F, Cornwall R, Kozin SH. Early<br />
functional recovery of elbow flexion and supination following<br />
median and/or ulnar nerve fascicle transfer in upper neonatal<br />
brachial plexus palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(3):215-21.<br />
29. Mackinnon SE, Novak CB, Myckatyn TM, Tung TH. Results<br />
of reinnervation of the biceps and brachialis muscles with a<br />
double fascicular transfer for elbow flexion. J Hand Surg Am.<br />
2005;30(5):978-85.<br />
30. Mafi P, Hindocha S, Dhital M. Advances of Peripheral Nerve Repair<br />
Techniques to Improve HandFunction: A Systematic Review of<br />
Literature. Open Orthop J. 2012;6(1):60–8.<br />
31. Malessy MJ, Pondaag W. Nerve surgery for neonatal brachial plexus<br />
palsy. J PediatrRehabil Med. 2011;4(2):141-8.<br />
32. Meals RA, Nelissen RG. The origin and meaning of neurotization. J<br />
Hand Surg Am. 1995;20(1):144-6.<br />
33. Miller JH, Garber ST, McCormick DE, Eskandari R, Walker<br />
ML, Rizk E. Oberlin transfer and partial radial to axillary nerve<br />
neurotization to repair an explosive traumatic injury to the brachial<br />
plexus in a child: case report. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013;29(11):2105-9.<br />
34. Narakas A, Hentz VR. Neurotization in brachial plexus injuries:<br />
indications and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1988;237:43-56.<br />
35. Oberlin C, Béal D, Leechaengvongs S, Salon A, Dauge MC, Sarcy<br />
JJ. Nerve transfer to the biceps muscle using a part of ulnar nerve for<br />
C5-C6 avulsion of the brachial plexus: anatomical study and report<br />
of four cases. J Hand Surg Am. 1994;19(2):232-7.<br />
36. Ouzounian JG. Risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus palsy.<br />
SeminPerinatol. 2014;38(4):219-21.<br />
37. Pondaag W, Malessy MJ. Intercostal and pectoral nerve transfers to<br />
re-innervate the biceps muscle in obstetric brachial plexus lesions. J<br />
Hand Surg Eur. 2014;39(6):647-52.<br />
38. Pondaag W, Malessy MJ. The Evidence for Nerve Repair in<br />
Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy Revisited. Biomed Res Int.<br />
2014;(2014):434619.<br />
39. Pondaag W, Malessy MJ, van Dijk JG, Thomeer RT. Natural history<br />
of obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med<br />
Child Neurol. 2004;46(2):138-44.<br />
40. Rentería MS, Silber R, Spizzirri FD. Tratado de pediatría Jorge<br />
Morano. 3° edición. Atlante, 2004.<br />
41. Robla-Costales J, Socolovsky M, Di Masi G, Robla-Costales D,<br />
Domitrovic L, Campero A. Fernández-Fernández J, Ibáñez-Plágaro<br />
J, García-Cosamalón J. Técnica de reconstrucción nerviosa en cirugía<br />
del plexo braquial traumatizado parte 2: transferencias nerviosas<br />
intraplexuales. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2011;22(6):521-34.<br />
42. Sandler TW. Lagman, embriología média. 13° Edición. Wolters<br />
kluwer, 2016.<br />
43. Sebastin SJ, Chung KC. Pathogenesis and management of<br />
deformities of the elbow, wrist, and hand in late neonatal brachial<br />
plexus palsy. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2011;4(2):119-30.<br />
44. Seddon H. Three types of nerve injury. Brain. 1943;66(4):237–88.<br />
45. Seddon HJ, Medawar PB, Smith H. Rate or regeneration of<br />
peripheral nerves in man. J Physiol. 1943;102(2):191-215.<br />
46. Shen PY, Nidecker AE, Neufeld EA, Lee PS, James MA, Bauer<br />
CIRUGÍA DE OBERLIN EN PARÁLISIS BRAQUIAL OBSTÉTRICA. NOTA TÉCNICA<br />
Luciano Grisotto, Jorge Luis Bustamante, Gonzalo Colombo, Carolina Maldonado, Nicolas Tello, Fernando Torres<br />
REV ARGENT NEUROC. | 2019 TRABAJO PREMIADO<br />
129<br />
AS. Non-Sedated Rapid Volumetric Proton Density MRI Predicts<br />
Neonatal Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy Functional Outcome. J<br />
Neuroimaging. 2017;27(2):248-54.<br />
47. Siqueira MG, Socolovsky M, Heise CO, Martins RS, Di Masi<br />
G. Efficacy and safety of Oberlin&#039;s procedure in the treatment of<br />
brachial plexus birth palsy. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(6):1156-60.<br />
48. Socolovsky M, Robla Costales J, Domínguez Paez M, Nizzo G,<br />
Valbuena S, Varone E. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: reviewing the<br />
literature comparing the results of primary versus secondary surgery.<br />
Childs Nerv Syst. 2016;32(3):415-25.<br />
49. Terzis JK, Kokkalis ZT. Pediatric brachial plexus reconstruction.<br />
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):370-85.<br />
50. Terzis JK, Kokkalis ZT.Outcomes of hand reconstruction in obstetric<br />
brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(2):516-26.<br />
51. Tse R, Kozin SH, Malessy MJ, Clarke HM. International Federation<br />
of Societies for Surgery of the Hand Committee report: the role of<br />
nerve transfers in the treatment of neonatal brachial plexus palsy. J<br />
Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(6):1246-59.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1282">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Cavernomas múltiples: abordaje microquirúrgico al área peritrigeminal y endoscópico transtentorial <br />
al área temporomesial<br />
Premio Video. XV Jornadas de Neurocirugía 2019]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Video]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Introducción: Los cavernomas cerebrales de localización en el tronco encefálico representan un desafío dentro de la neurocirugía por la nobleza de esta estructura. A su vez, el sangrado en esta localización se relaciona con elevada morbilidad y mortalidad. El síndrome de cavernomatosis múltiple familiar es un trastorno autosómico dominante que se caracteriza por la presencia de 5 o más cavernomas cerebrales en 2 o más miembros de una familia. El tratamiento quirúrgico de esta enfermedad se limita a aquellos cavernomas sintomáticos. Objetivo: Presentar la exéresis múltiple de tres cavernomas ipsilaterales supra e infratentoriales mediante técnica combinada microquirúrgica y endoscópica.<br />
Materiales y métodos: Paciente femenina de 49 años que presenta hematoma protuberancial con hemiparesia izquierda. Tiene antecedentes de cavernomas cerebrales en familiares de primer grado. En Resonancia Magnética con secuencias de susceptibilidad magnética (SWI) se evidencian malformaciones cavernosas múltiples en protuberancia, cerebelo, región temporomesial derecha y lóbulo frontal derecho. Se plantea la exéresis microquirúrgica de la lesión protuberancial y cerebelosa combinado con resección transtentorial endoscópica del cavernoma temporomesial.<br />
Resultados: Mediante abordaje supracerebeloso infratentorial se logró la exéresis del cavernoma cerebeloso y protuberacial. Se utilizó el área peritrigeminal derecha como área de acceso seguro al tronco. Con el uso de endoscopio rígido se realizó apertura del tentorio a nivel del conducto auditivo interno con posterior resección endoscópica del cavernoma temporomesial. La paciente curso el postoperatorio sin secuelas neurológicas.<br />
Conclusión: La precisión del microscopio y la versatilidad del endoscopio nos permiten realizar resecciones de múltiples lesiones en distintas áreas.<br />
<br />
]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:tableOfContents><![CDATA[Background: Brain stem cavernous malformations represent a challenge for neurosurgeons due to the strong functionality role of this anatomic structure. At the same time, the bleeding in this area is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Familial multiple cavernomatosis syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder defined as the presence of five or more brain cavernous malformation in two or more members of a family. In this disease, the surgical treatment is limited to the symptomatic cavernomas.<br />
Objective: Present the surgical treatment of three ipsilateral cavernomas using a combined microsurgical and endoscopic technique. Methods: 49-years-old female patient attended to the emergency department with acute left hemiparesis and a pons bleeding. She had family history of cerebral cavernous malformation. Magnetic resonance with susceptibility weight imaging (SWI) shows multiple cavernous malformation in pons, cerebellum, right parahippocampal region and right frontal lobe. The surgical planning consisted of microsurgical excision of the cerebellar and pons lesions combined with a transtentorial endoscopic approach to the right parahippocampal cavernoma. <br />
Results: We made a supracerebellar and infratentorial approach with satisfactory excision of cerebellar and pons cavernomas. We use the peritrigeminal zone as a safety entry to the pons. With a rigid skull base endoscope, we opened the tentorium just above the internal auditory meatus. Also, we achieved an endoscopic exeresis of the parahippocampal cavernoma. The patient did not have neurological deficits after surgery.<br />
Conclusion: The precision of the microscope and the versatility of the endoscope let us attempt excision of multiple lesions in distant areas.<br />
<br />
]]></dcterms:tableOfContents>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Franco Rubino]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Juan Iaconis Campbell]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[German Degano]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Miguel Mural]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Maximiliano Núñez]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Eduardo Salas]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:dateAccepted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateAccepted>
    <dcterms:dateSubmitted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateSubmitted>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1291">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Schwannomatosis del nervio plantar interno.<br />
Presentación de caso<br />
Premio Póster. XV Jornadas de Neurocirugía 2019]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Trabajos Premiados]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Introducción: Las Schwannomatosis Mononeurales de los Miembros son entidades muy poco frecuentes, escasamente<br />
conocidas y raramente publicadas en la bibliografía internacional, éstas se encuentran caracterizadas por la existencia de<br />
múltiples formaciones nodulares o plexiformes con compromiso exclusivo de un solo nervio, todas con diagnóstico patológico<br />
de schwannoma, excluyéndose a otras entidades tumorales y fuera del contexto de una neurofibromatosis. Aquí se presenta<br />
un caso con compromiso del nervio plantar medial o interno.<br />
Material y método: Se evaluó y analizo el caso clínico, a nivel semiológico y Neurorradiológico, Neurofisilógico. Se definió la<br />
conducta terapéutica y quirúrgica. Se evaluaron resultados mediante: análisis semiológico y seguimiento con imágenes.<br />
Descripción y resultados: Paciente sexo masculino de 45 años de edad consulta por presentar múltiples tumoraciones palpables<br />
en región retromaleolar interna y plantar derecho y disestesias al apoyo, con antecedente de cirugía de schwannoma plantar. Al<br />
examen neurológico: masas palpables en los sectores previamente indicados y Tinel a nivel retromaleolar interno y plantar.<br />
RMN: múltiples nódulos con captación intermedia de contraste, hipertensos en T2.<br />
Se practicó resección quirúrgica mediante amplio abordaje, se identificaron múltiples nódulos, uno de ellos de aspecto<br />
plexiforme que involucraba la totalidad del nervio plantar interno imposibilitando la preservación del tronco por lo cual se<br />
practicó microneurorrafia con interposición de puente de safeno interno.<br />
Discusión y conclusión: Las Schwannomatosis Mononeurales de los Miembros son entidades extremadamente raras, se han<br />
reportado con una frecuencia un poco mayor a aquellas que involucran a los nervios mediano y cubital, en sus características<br />
macroscópicas las lesiones fueron publicadas como pertenecientes a la variante nodular para esa escasa mayoría. La<br />
configuración plexiforme de los schwannomas es menos frecuente que la nodular per se y, en general. está asociada a<br />
troncos menores, fuera de estos territorios, su rareza es extrema. Este caso clínico resulta aún más especial por tratarse de<br />
una Schwannomatosis Mononeural del Plantar Medial con variante de tipo mixto, es decir nodular con una masa plexiforme<br />
dominante. Esta entidad no la hemos encontrado en la bibliografía internacional.<br />
Por otro lado, la resección quirúrgica de estos tumores, cuando son nodulares es compatible con la preservación del tronco<br />
nervioso, sacrificando solamente, su fascículo de origen. Este caso, dada la configuración descripta del tumor principal, el cual<br />
involucraba la totalidad del tronco, se hizo imposible la preservación del nervio, para lo cual debió realizarse microneurorrafia<br />
con puente. Como consideración final, creemos que es de capital importancia la adecuada exploración y planificación pre e<br />
intraoperatoria de estos pacientes.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:tableOfContents><![CDATA[Introduction: Mononeural Schwannomatosis located at limbs are very infrequent entities, the knowledge about its are very<br />
poor, and there are just a few publications related to them. This articles make reference multiple nodular or plexiform lesions<br />
with involvement oh only one nerve, every one whit diagnosis of schwannoma, excluding fibromatosis. In this article, we<br />
describe a patient with who suffered the involvement of multiples tumours with nodular and plexiform configuration.<br />
Material y method: The clinical case was analysed by different media, clinical, neuro physiological and by neuroimages. By this<br />
approaches were defined and evaluated the surgical outcomes and results.<br />
Clinical case: Male, 45 years old. Multiples tumours at plantar region. Tinel Sign with multiple palpable masses al retromaleolar<br />
sulcus and plantar region, plantar schwannoma operated on previously.<br />
RMN: multinodular configuration at level of medial plantar nerve, with intermediate contrast reinforcement.<br />
An extended approach was performed, from retromaleolar sulcus to medial aspect of the foot, and finishing inside the digitalplantar<br />
sulcus. Complete resection was performed, multiples nodulos were found, the bigger had a plexiform configuration, was<br />
imposible the preservation of the nerve trunk and the, the interposition of sural nerve was realized. With good evolution<br />
Conclusions: For this very rare entities, the bigger frequency was reported et limbs.<br />
The most frequent locations was at medial nerve, second place occupied by the ulnar nerve, we didn’t find on international<br />
literature a plexiform tumour inside the medial plantar nerve.<br />
On the other hand, we think that the complete resection for this tumours when are nodular, the complete resection with<br />
preservation of the main trunk, is feasible. Ehen the tumour has a plexiform pattern; complete resection is only feasible with<br />
trunk nerve resection and interposition of nerve graft.]]></dcterms:tableOfContents>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Luis Mariano Cuello]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Leonardo Guidobono]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Betiana Arnaudin]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Carlos Llerena]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:dateAccepted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateAccepted>
    <dcterms:dateSubmitted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateSubmitted>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[1. Angelini A1, Bevoni R, Biz C, Cerchiaro MC, Girolami M, Ruggieri<br />
P.Schwannoma of the foot: report of four cases and literature review.<br />
Acta Biomed. 2019 Jan 10;90(1-S):214-220. doi: 10.23750/abm.<br />
v90i1-S.8079.<br />
2. Li XN, Cui JL, Christopasak SP, Kumar A, Peng ZG.Multiple<br />
plexiform schwannomas in the plantar aspect of the foot: case<br />
report and literature review.BMC MusculoskeletDisord. 2014 Oct<br />
11;15:342. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-342.<br />
3. Gosk J, Gutkowska O, Urban M, Wnukiewicz W, Reichert P,<br />
Ziółkowski P.Results of surgical treatment of schwannomas<br />
arising from extremities.Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:547926. doi:<br />
10.1155/2015/547926. Epub 2015 Feb 22.<br />
4. MarkosIoannou, 1 Ioannis Papanastassiou,1 Ioanna<br />
Iakowidou,2 Stamatios Kottakis,1 and NikolaosDemertzis.<br />
Plexiformschwannoma of the posterior tibial nerve: a case report.<br />
Published online 2009 Aug 17. doi: 10.4076/1757-1626-2-8392.<br />
5. Touteréférence à cet article doit porter la mention :Valeyrie-Allanore<br />
L., Wolkenstein P. Neurofibromatose 1 et formesvariantes. EMC<br />
(ElsevierMassonSAS,Paris), Neurologie, 17-170-A-65, 2009.<br />
6. Nafiseh Mortazavi, Kambiz Novin Farahnaz Bidari Zerehpoosh,<br />
Managol Sadatsafavi. Plexiform Schwannoma of the Finger: A<br />
Case Report and Literature Review.Departments of Pathology and<br />
Clinical Oncology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,<br />
Tehran, Iran. July 4, 2019, IP: 181.167.224.166.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1281">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Drenaje ventricular al exterior de tunelización larga: un<br />
método costo-efectivo para reducir las complicaciones<br />
Premio Beca Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía. XV Jornadas Argentinas<br />
de Neurocirugía 2019]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Artículo Original]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Introducción: La colocación de drenajes ventriculares al exterior (DVE) es uno de los procedimientos más frecuentes de<br />
la neurocirugía, tanto en pediatría como en adultos, sin embargo, no se encuentra exento de complicaciones. La tasa de<br />
infección asociada al drenaje puede serdel 25%. En nuestro Hospital encontramos una incidencia del 22% anual.<br />
Al ser sistemas que no cuentan con una regulación de la salida del líquido, el paciente debe permanecer en decúbito dorsal<br />
estricto todo el tratamiento.<br />
Nuestro objetivo es diseñar un nuevo sistema de drenaje ventricular al exterior de tunelización larga (DVET) que lidie con estos<br />
problemas al mismo tiempo que reduzca los costos hospitalarios.<br />
Material y métodos: Se realizó un ensayo clínico prospectivo en el que se colocaron 25 DVETL entre el 1/9/2018 al 1/5/2019<br />
que se compararon con el sistema tradicional de DVE.<br />
Resultados: La presencia de fístula se asoció más frecuentemente a los DVE en comparación con los DVETL, esta diferencia<br />
fue estadísticamente significativa (30% vs 8% p=0,029). La presencia de infección asociada al drenaje fue significativamente<br />
mayor en los DVE en comparación con los DVETL, esta diferencia fue estadísticamente significativa (22% vs 0% p=0,009). Los<br />
pacientes con DVE tradicional utilizaron el doble de recursos y generaron el doble de costos que los pacientes con DVETL.<br />
Conclusión: Se realizó una presentación detallada del nuevo sistema de DVETL que presenta una disminución en la incidencia<br />
de fístula de LCR e infección asociada al drenaje. A su vez aparenta ser costo-efectiva en comparación con el sistema<br />
tradicional de DVE.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:tableOfContents><![CDATA[Introduction: External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is one of the most frequent procedures in neurosurgery, both in<br />
pediatrics and in adults. The global rate of ventriculostomy-associated infections could rich 25%. In our Hospital, we found an<br />
annual incidence of 22%.<br />
In addition, since it does not have a regulation of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) flow, the patient must remain in strict dorsal<br />
decubitus throughout the entire treatment.<br />
Our goal is to design a new long-tunneled external ventricular drain (LTEVD) that deals with these problems while reducing<br />
hospital costs.<br />
Material and method: A prospective clinical trial was conducted in which 25 LTEVD were placed between 1/9/2018 and<br />
1/5/2019 that were compared with the traditional EVD system.<br />
Results: The presence of CSF fistula was associated more frequently with EVD compared to LTEVD; this difference was<br />
statistically significant (30% vs. 8% p = 0.029). The presence of associated infection was significantly higher in EVD compared<br />
to LTEVD, and this difference was statistically significant (22% vs. 0% p = 0.009). Patients with traditional EVD used twice as<br />
many resources and generated twice the cost as patients with DVETL.<br />
Conclusion: A detailed presentation was made of the new LTEVD system that presents a decrease in the incidence of CSF<br />
fistula and associated infection. At the same time, it appears to be cost-effective in comparison with the traditional DVE system.]]></dcterms:tableOfContents>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Amparo Sáenz]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Romina Argañaraz]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Beatriz Mantese]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:dateAccepted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateAccepted>
    <dcterms:dateSubmitted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateSubmitted>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[1. Arabi Y, Memish ZA, Balkhy HH, et al. Ventriculostomy-associated<br />
infections: Incidence and risk factors. Am J Infect Control.<br />
2005;33(3):137-143. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2004.11.008.<br />
2. Attenello FJ, Garces-Ambrossi GL, Zaidi HA, Sciubba DM,<br />
Jallo GI. Hospital Costs Associated With Shunt Infections in<br />
Patients Receiving Antibiotic-Impregnated Shunt Catheters<br />
Versus Standard Shunt Catheters. Neurosurg. 2010;66(2):284-289.<br />
doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000363405.12584.4D.<br />
3. Bota DP, Lefranc F, Vilallobos HR, Brimioulle S, Vincent J-L.<br />
Ventriculostomy-related infections in critically ill patients: a 6-year<br />
experience. J Neurosurg. 2005;103(3):468-472. doi:10.3171/<br />
jns.2005.103.3.0468.<br />
4. Camacho EF, Boszczowski Í, Basso M, et al. Infection rate and risk<br />
factors associated with infections related to external ventricular<br />
drain. Infect. 2011;39(1):47-51. doi:10.1007/s15010-010-0073-5.<br />
5. Cinibulak Z, Aschoff A, Apedjinou A, Kaminsky J, Trost HA,<br />
Krauss JK. Current practice of external ventricular drainage: a survey<br />
among neurosurgical departments in Germany. Acta Neurochir.<br />
2016;158(5):847-853. doi:10.1007/s00701-016-2747-y.<br />
6. Collins CDE, Hartley JC, Chakraborty A, Thompson DNP. Long<br />
subcutaneous tunnelling reduces infection rates in paediatric<br />
external ventricular drains. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014;30(10):1671-<br />
1678. doi:10.1007/s00381-014-2523-3.<br />
7. Edwards NC, Engelhart L, Casamento EMH, McGirt MJ. Costconsequence<br />
analysis of antibiotic-impregnated shunts and external<br />
ventricular drains in hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(1):139-<br />
147. doi:10.3171/2014.9.JNS131277.<br />
8. González S, Carbonaro M, Fedullo AG, et al. Cerebrospinal<br />
fluid shunt-associated infections in pediatrics: Analysis of the<br />
epidemiology and mortality risk factors. Arch Argent Pediatr.<br />
2018;116(3):198-203. doi:10.5546/aap.2018.eng.198.<br />
9. Hader WJ, Steinbok P. The value of routine cultures of the<br />
cerebrospinal fluid in patients with external ventricular drains.<br />
Neurosurg. 2000;46(5):1149–53–discussion1153–5.<br />
10. Holloway KL, Barnes T, Choi S, et al. Ventriculostomy infections:<br />
the effect of monitoring duration and catheter exchange in<br />
584 patients. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(3):419-424. doi:10.3171/<br />
jns.1996.85.3.0419.<br />
11. Kanik A, Sirin S, Kose E, Eliacik K, Anil M, Helvaci M. Clinical<br />
and economic results of ventriculoperitoneal shunt infections in<br />
children. Turk Neurosurg. 2015;25(1):58-62. doi:10.5137/1019-<br />
5149.JTN.8540-13.2.<br />
12. Khanna RK, Rosenblum ML, Rock JP, Malik GM. Prolonged<br />
external ventricular drainage with percutaneous long-tunnel<br />
ventriculostomies. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:791-794. doi:10.3171/<br />
jns.1995.83.5.0791.<br />
13. Klipin M, Mare I, Hazelhurst S, Kramer B. The process of installing<br />
REDCap, a web based database supporting biomedical research: the<br />
first year. Appl Clin Inform. 2014;5(4):916-929. doi:10.4338/ACI-<br />
2014-06-CR-0054.<br />
14. Korinek AM. Risk factors for neurosurgical site infections after<br />
craniotomy: a prospective multicenter study of 2944 patients. The<br />
French Study Group of Neurosurgical Infections, the SEHP, and the<br />
C-CLIN Paris-Nord. Service Epidémiologie Hygiène et Prévention.<br />
Neurosurg. 1997;41(5):1073–9–discussion1079–81.<br />
15. Lam SK, Srinivasan VM, Luerssen TG, Pan I-W. Cerebrospinal<br />
fluid shunt placement in the pediatric population: a model<br />
of hospitalization cost. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(5):E5.<br />
doi:10.3171/2014.8.FOCUS14454.<br />
16. Lewin S, Low SW. External ventricular drain infections; successful<br />
implementation of strategies to reduce infection rate. Singap Med J.<br />
April 2012:1-5.<br />
17. Mayhall CG, Archer NH, Lamb VA, et al. Ventriculostomy-related<br />
infections. A prospective epidemiologic study. N Engl J Med.<br />
1984;310(9):553-559. doi:10.1056/NEJM198403013100903.<br />
18. Meirovitch J, Kitai-Cohen Y, Keren G, Fiendler G, Rubinstein E.<br />
Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J.<br />
1987;6(10):921-924.<br />
19. Mullan E, Lucas C, Mackie S, Carachi R. Audit of<br />
ventriculoperitoneal shunt infections in paediatric<br />
patients, 2006–2013. Scott Med J. 2014;59(4):198-203.<br />
doi:10.1177/0036933014548665.<br />
20. Muralidharan R. External ventricular drains: Management and<br />
complications. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6(Suppl 6):S271-S274.<br />
doi:10.4103/2152-7806.157620.<br />
21. O&#039;Neill BR, Velez DA, Braxton EE, Whiting D, Oh MY. A survey<br />
of ventriculostomy and intracranial pressure monitor placement<br />
practices. World Neurosurg. 2008;70(3):268-273. doi:10.1016/j.<br />
surneu.2007.05.007.<br />
22. Paramore CG, Turner DA. Relative risks of ventriculostomy<br />
infection and morbidity. Acta Neurochir. 1994;127(1-2):79-84.<br />
23. Park J, Choi Y-J, Ohk B, Chang H-H. Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak<br />
at Percutaneous Exit of Ventricular Catheter as a Crucial Risk<br />
Factor for External Ventricular Drainage-Related Infection in<br />
Adult Neurosurgical Patients. World Neurosurg. 2017;109:1-6.<br />
doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.190.<br />
24. Sandalcioglu IE, Stolke D. Failure of regular external ventricular<br />
drain exchange to reduce CSF infection. J Neurol Neurosurg<br />
Psychiatr. 2003;74(11):1598–9–authorreply1599. doi:10.1136/<br />
jnnp.74.11.1598-a.<br />
25. Simon TD, Riva-Cambrin J, Srivastava R, et al. Hospital care<br />
for children with hydrocephalus in the United States: utilization,<br />
charges, comorbidities, and deaths. J Neurosurg Pediatr.<br />
2008;1(2):131-137. doi:10.3171/PED/2008/1/2/131.<br />
26. Simpkins CJ. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt infections in patients with<br />
hydrocephalus. Pediatr Nurs. 2005;31(6):457-462.<br />
27. Smith RW, Alksne JF. Infections complicating the use of external<br />
ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg. 1976;44(5):567-570. doi:10.3171/<br />
jns.1976.44.5.0567.<br />
28. Tunkel AR, Hasbun R, Bhimraj A, et al. 2017 Infectious Diseases<br />
Society of America’s Clinical Practice Guidelines for Healthcare-<br />
Associated Ventriculitis and Meningitis. Clin Infect Dis.<br />
2017;64(6):e34-e65. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw861.<br />
29. Tunthanathip T, Kanjanapradit K, Sae-Heng S, Oearsakul T,<br />
Sakarunchai I. Predictive factors of the outcome and intraventricular<br />
rupture of brain abscess. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98(2):170-180.<br />
30. Vinchon M, Dhellemmes P. Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection: risk<br />
factors and long-term follow-up. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006;22(7):692-<br />
697. doi:10.1007/s00381-005-0037-8.<br />
31. Wong GKC, Poon WS, Wai S, Yu LM, Lyon D, Lam JMK. Failure<br />
of regular external ventricular drain exchange to reduce cerebrospinal<br />
fluid infection: result of a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol<br />
Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2002;73(6):759-761.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1288">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[RODEXKE. Infiltración con ropivacaína,<br />
dexmedetomidina y ketorolac en cirugía espinal:<br />
Una estrategia para disminuir el consumo de opioides<br />
2do Premio Beca Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía.<br />
XV Jornadas de Neurocirugía 2019]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Trabajos Premiados]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Objetivos: Evaluar la efectividad de la infiltración del sitio quirúrgico, con ropivacaína, dexmedetomidina y ketorolac, en<br />
pacientes sometidos a instrumentación transpedicular dorsolumbar con técnica mini invasiva, en cuanto al consumo de<br />
opioides durante la internación.<br />
Materiales y métodos: Se recolectaron en forma retrospectiva los datos prospectivos de las historias clínicas de pacientes<br />
con una instrumentación con tornillos transpediculares percutáneos operados entre Junio del 2016 y Diciembre del 2018. 32<br />
pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de selección. Se infiltró en el momento del cierre quirúrgico con una solución preparada<br />
con 150 mg de ropivacaína, 0,7 mcg/kg de dexmedetomidina y 60 mg de ketorolac, disuelto en solución fisiológica estéril para<br />
completar 40ml (Grupo M) y se la comparó con pacientes en los cuales solo se infiltró con 150mg de ropivacaína (Grupo E).<br />
Resultados: El consumo de equivalentes de morfina durante las primeras 72hs postoperatorias presentó en el grupo M una<br />
mediana de 0mg, y el grupo E, una mediana de 9,5mg (RIQ de 13,35), con una p&lt;0,000. Por el contrario el consumo de<br />
morfina en la sala de recuperación presentó una mediana de 0mg (RIQ de 2) para el grupo M, y de 2mg (RIQ de 5) para el<br />
grupo E, sin encontrarse una diferencia significativa, p=0,132.<br />
Conclusión: Los resultados obtenidos en la comparación del consumo de opioides durante las primeras 72hs de la<br />
internación permite inferir que esta combinación de fármacos es superior respecto a la infiltración estándar con ropivacaína,<br />
independientemente de la estrategia analgésica utilizada durante el tiempo quirúrgico.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:tableOfContents><![CDATA[Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of a surgical site infiltration with ropivacaine, dexmedetomidine and ketorolac,<br />
in reducing opioid consumption in patients with a transpedicular dorsolumbar instrumentation using a minimally invasive<br />
technique.<br />
Materials y methods: We retrospectively collected data from patient’s charts from June of 2016 to December of 2018. 32<br />
patients with minimally invasive transpedicular dorsolumbar instrumentation, who met all criteria, were included in the analysis.<br />
During wound closure a mixture of 150mg of ropivacaine, 0,7mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine and 60mg of ketorolac, diluted in<br />
normal saline to achieve 40ml was injected (Group M). We compared them with patients in whom only 150mg of ropivacaine<br />
and saline where injected in the surgical site (Group E).<br />
Results: Morphine equivalents use during the first 72 hours postoperative had a median of 0mg for group M, and of 9,5mg (IQR<br />
of 13.35), with a p&lt;0,000. On the contrary, morphine use during post anesthesia care unit stance had a median of 0mg (IQR of<br />
2) for group M and of 2mg (IQR of 5) for group E, without a statistically significant difference, p=0,132.<br />
Conclusion: The result of the analysis of opioid consumption during the first 72 hours postoperative allows concluding that<br />
the infiltration of these 3 drugs together its superior to the standard infiltration with ropivacaine, independently of the analgesic<br />
strategy used during the surgery]]></dcterms:tableOfContents>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Sebastián Kornfeld]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Hernan Bovery]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Jorge Rasmussen]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Federico Landriel]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Santiago Hem]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[ Claudio Yampolsky]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:dateAccepted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateAccepted>
    <dcterms:dateSubmitted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateSubmitted>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[1. Andersen LJ, Poulsen T, Krogh B, Nielsen T. Postoperative analgesia in<br />
total hip arthroplasty infiltration. Acta Orthop. 2007; 78(2): 187–92.<br />
2. Araimo Morselli FSM, Zuccarini F, Caporlingua F, Scarpa I,<br />
Imperiale C, Caporlingua A, et al. Intrathecal Versus Intravenous<br />
Morphine in Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A<br />
Blinded Randomized Comparative Prospective Study. Spine (Phila.<br />
Pa. 1976). 2017; 42(5): 281–4.<br />
3. Bilgin TE, Bozlu M, Atici S, Cayan S, Tasdelen B. Wound<br />
infiltration with bupivacaine and intramuscular diclofenac reduces<br />
postoperative tramadol consumption in patients undergoing radical<br />
retropubic prostatectomy: A prospective, double-blind, placebocontrolled,<br />
randomized study. Urology 2011; 78(6): 1281–5.<br />
4. Brambilla S, Ruosi C, La Maida GA, Caserta S. Prevention of<br />
venous thromboembolism in spinal surgery. Eur. Spine J. 2004;<br />
13(1): 1–8.<br />
5. Brodano GB, Martikos K, Lolli F, Gasbarrini A, Cioni A, Bandiera<br />
S, et al. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative<br />
Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I. J. Spinal Disord. Tech.<br />
2015; 28(10): 559–64.<br />
6. Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR, Glassman SD, Johnson JR.<br />
Perioperative Complications of Posterior Lumbar Decompression<br />
and Arthrodesis in Older Adults. J. Bone Jt. Surg. - Ser. A 2003;<br />
RODEXKE. INFILTRACIÓN CON ROPIVACAÍNA, DEXMEDETOMIDINA Y KETOROLAC EN CIRUGÍA ESPINAL: UNA ESTRATEGIA PARA DISMINUIR EL CONSUMO<br />
DE OPIOIDES<br />
Sebastián Kornfeld, Hernan Bovery, Jorge Rasmussen, Federico Landriel, Santiago Hem, Claudio Yampolsky<br />
REV ARGENT NEUROC. | 2019 TRABAJO PREMIADO<br />
126<br />
85(11): 2089–92.<br />
7. Carvalho B, Clark DJ, Angst MS. Local and Systemic Release of<br />
Cytokines, Nerve Growth Factor, Prostaglandin E2, and Substance<br />
P in Incisional Wounds and Serum Following Cesarean Delivery. J.<br />
Pain 2008; 9(7): 650–7.<br />
8. Chan AKM, Cheung CW, Chong YK. Alpha-2 agonists in acute pain<br />
management. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2010; 11(17): 2849–68.<br />
9. Cheung CW, Fu K, Ng J, Choi WS, Chiu K, Lun C, et al. Evaluation<br />
of the Analgesic Efficacy of Local Dexmedetomidine application.<br />
Clin J Pain 2011; 27(5): 377–82.<br />
10. Cho KJ, Suk S Il, Park SR, Kim JH, Kim SS, Choi WK, et al.<br />
Complications in posterior fusion and instrumentation for<br />
degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976). 2007; 32(20):<br />
2232–7.<br />
11. Connelly NR, Reuben SS, Albert M, Page D, D M. Use of<br />
preincisional ketorolac in hernia patients: Intravenous versus<br />
Surgical Site. Reg. Anesth. 1997; 22(3): 229–32.<br />
12. Dirks J, Møiniche S, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB. Mechanisms of<br />
postoperative pain: Clinical indications for a contribution of central<br />
neuronal sensitization. Anesthesiology 2002; 97(6): 1591–6.<br />
13. Elder JB, Hoh DJ, Liu CY, Wang MY. Postoperative continuous<br />
paravertebral anesthetic infusion for pain control in posterior<br />
cervical spine surgery: a case-control study. Neurosurgery 2010; 66(3<br />
Suppl Operative): 99–106; discussion 106-7.<br />
14. Gabriel JS, Gordin V. Alpha 2 agonists in regional anesthesia and<br />
analgesia. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2001; 14(6): 751—3.<br />
15. Goldstein CL, Macwan K, Sundararajan K, Rampersaud YR.<br />
Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior<br />
lumbar fusion: A systematic review. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014;<br />
472(6): 1727–37.<br />
16. Hannibal K, Galatius H, Hansen A, Obel E, Ejlersen E. Preoperative<br />
wound infiltration with bupivacaine reduces early and late opioid<br />
requirement after hysterectomy. Anesth. Analg. 1996; 83(2): 376–81.<br />
17. Karmakar MK, Booker PD, Franks R. Bilateral continuous<br />
paravertebral block used for postoperative analgesia in an infant<br />
having bilateral thoracotomy. Paediatr Anaesth 1997; 7(6): 469–71.<br />
18. Kim CW, Surgery L. Scientific basis of minimally invasive spine<br />
surgery: prevention of multifidus muscle injury during posterior<br />
lumbar surgery. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976). 2010; 35(26 Suppl): 281–6.<br />
19. Kim H-J, Park J-H, Kim J-W, Kang K-T, Chang B-S, Lee C-K, et<br />
al. Prediction of Postoperative Pain Intensity after Lumbar Spinal<br />
Surgery Using Pain Sensitivity and Preoperative Back Pain Severity.<br />
Pain Med. 2014; 15(12): 2037–45.<br />
20. Kumar A, Srivastava U, Saxena S, Gandhi NK, Joshi S, Payal Y.<br />
Comparison of Incisional Infiltration of Ketorolac with or without<br />
Bupivacaine Versus Intramuscular Ketorolac for Post-Operative<br />
Analgesia. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol 2005; 21(2): 165–8.<br />
21. Li Y, Lu S, Ma SC, Fan HW, Zhao GQ. Effects of patientcontrolled<br />
epidural analgesia and patient-controlled intravenous<br />
analgesia on analgesia in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery.<br />
Am. J. Ther. 2016; 23(6): 1806–12.<br />
22. Lin Y, Chen W, Chen A. Comparison between Minimally Invasive<br />
and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion - A Meta-<br />
Analysis of Clinical Results and Safety Outcomes..pdf. J Neurol<br />
Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2016; 77(1): 2–10.<br />
23. Liu SS, Richman JM, Thirlby RC, Wu CL. Efficacy of Continuous<br />
Wound Catheters Delivering Local Anesthetic for Postoperative<br />
Analgesia: A Quantitative and Qualitative Systematic Review of<br />
Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2006; 203(6): 914–32.<br />
24. Ma W, St-Jacques B, Cruz Duarte P. Targeting pain mediators<br />
induced by injured nerve-derived COX2 and PGE2 to treat<br />
neuropathic pain. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets 2012; vol.<br />
16(6): 527–40.<br />
25. Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, Comstock BA,<br />
Hollingworth W, et al. Expeditures and health status among adults<br />
with back and neck problems. Jama 2008; 299(6): 656–64.<br />
26. Mather LE, Copeland SE, Ladd LA. Acute toxicity of local<br />
anesthetics: Underlying pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic<br />
concepts. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2005; 30(6): 553–66.<br />
27. Obayah GM, Refaie A, Aboushanab O, Ibraheem N, Abdelazees<br />
M. Addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine for greater palatine<br />
nerve block prolongs postoperative analgesia after cleft palate repair.<br />
Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2010; 27(3): 280–4.<br />
28. Perkins FM KH. Chronic Pain as an Outcome of Surgery A Review<br />
of Predictive Factors. Anesthesiology 2000; 93(4): 1123–33.<br />
29. Qureshi RM, Khan FA. Effects of bupivacaine infiltration on<br />
postoperative tramadol consumption in elective day care unilateral<br />
inguinal hernia repair. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2016; 66(3): 256–9.<br />
30. Reynolds RAK, Legakis JE, Tweedie J, Chung Y, Ren EJ, BeVier<br />
PA, et al. Postoperative Pain Management after Spinal Fusion<br />
Surgery: An Analysis of the Efficacy of Continuous Infusion of<br />
Local Anesthetics. Glob. Spine J. 2013; 3(1): 7–13.<br />
31. Romsing J, Moiniche S, Ostergaard D, Dahl JB. Local infiltration<br />
with NSAIDs for postoperative analgesia : Acta Anaesthesiol Scand<br />
2000; (44): 672–83<br />
32. Ross PA, Smith BM, Tolo VT, Khemani RG. Continuous infusion<br />
of bupivacaine reduces postoperative morphine use in adolescent<br />
idiopathic scoliosis after posterior spine fusion. Spine (Phila. Pa.<br />
1976). 2011; 36(18): 1478–83.<br />
33. Röstlund T, Kehlet H. High-dose local infiltration analgesia after<br />
hip and knee replacement—what is it, why does it work, and what<br />
are the future challenges? Acta Orthop. 2007; 78(2): 159–61.<br />
34. Sahbaie P, Shi X, Guo T, Qiao Y, Yeomans DC, Kingery WS, et al.<br />
Role of substance P signaling in enhanced nociceptive sensitization<br />
and local cytokine production after incision. Pain 2009; 145(3): 341–9.<br />
35. Sansone JM, del Rio AM, Anderson PA. The Prevalence of<br />
and Specific Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolic Disease<br />
Following Elective Spine Surgery. J. Bone Jt. Surgery-American Vol.<br />
2010; 92(2): 304–13.<br />
36. Scheufler K-M, Dohmen H, Vougioukas VI. Percutaneous<br />
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of<br />
Degenerative Lumbar Instability. Oper. Neurosurg. 2007; 60(April):<br />
203–13.<br />
37. Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, Bowler GM, Bloomfield P, Lundh R.<br />
Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine.<br />
Anesth Analg 1989; 69(5): 563–9.<br />
38. Smith H, Elliott J. Alpha2 receptors and agonists in pain<br />
management. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 2001; vol. 14(5):<br />
513–8.<br />
39. Street JT, Lenehan BJ, Dipaola CP, Boyd MD, Kwon BK, Paquette<br />
SJ, et al. Morbidity and mortality of major adult spinal surgery. A<br />
prospective cohort analysis of 942 consecutive patients. Spine J.<br />
2012; 12(1): 22–34.<br />
40. Talke P, Richardson CA, Fisher DM. Postoperative<br />
Pharmacokinetics of Dexmedetomidine. Anesth Analg<br />
1997;85:113642) 1997; 85: 1136–42.<br />
41. Virdee JS, Nadig A, Anagnostopoulos G, George KJ. Comparison<br />
of peri-operative and 12-month lifestyle outcomes in minimally<br />
invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional<br />
lumbar fusion. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2017; 31(2): 167–71.<br />
42. Yoshitomi T, Kohjitani A, Maeda S, Higuchi H, Shimada M,<br />
Miyawaki T. Dexmedetomidine enhances the local anesthetic action<br />
of lidocaine via an α-2a adrenoceptor. Anesth. Analg. 2008; 107(1):<br />
96–101.<br />
43. Yu JM, Sun H, Wu C, Dong CS, Lu Y, Zhang Y. The Analgesic<br />
Effect of Ropivacaine Combined with Dexmedetomidine for<br />
Incision Infiltration after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Surg.<br />
Laparosc. Endosc. Percutaneous Tech. 2016; 26(6): 449–54.<br />
44. Zink W, Graf BM. The toxicity of local anesthetics: The place of<br />
ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2008;<br />
21(5): 645–50.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1289">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[¿Cómo entrenar para el uso del exoscopio?<br />
Utilización de un novedoso simulador de exoscopía<br />
de bajo costo por residentes de neurocirugía<br />
Premio Beca AANC-FLANC. XV Jornadas de Neurocirugía 2019 de AANC]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Trabajos Premiados]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Introducción: Analizar el impacto del entrenamiento en una estación de simulación en exoscopía (ESA) de bajo costo, utilizado<br />
por un grupo de residentes de neurocirugía.<br />
Materiales y métodos: Se reclutaron 6 residentes de neurocirugía, todos ellos sin experiencia previa en exoscopía. Se<br />
desarrolló una estación de simulación en exoscopía compuesta por una computadora, una webcam y una fuente de luz.<br />
Todos los participantes realizaron un tutorial introductorio, un ejercicio inicial de 5 suturas (cada sutura fue clasificada en forma<br />
binaria como correcta e incorrecta), evaluando el tiempo necesario para completar dicho ejercicio y la eficacia (definida como<br />
la relación entre suturas correctas y el total). Posteriormente se realizaron 3 sesiones de entrenamiento semanal de 1 hora<br />
cada una y una evaluación final con las mismas características que la inicial. Ambas evaluaciones fueron estudiadas por un<br />
neurocirujano senior que realizó un análisis, así como la puntuación de cada ejercicio de los participantes.<br />
Resultados: El tiempo promedio de realización del ejercicio inicial fue de 31 minutos con 59 segundos, con una eficacia<br />
promedio del 70%. Luego del entrenamiento el promedio de tiempo fue 18 minutos y 12 segundos, con una eficacia del 80%.<br />
Conclusión: El entrenamiento en este simulador demostró una notable mejoría en los tiempos y la calidad de la técnica<br />
exoscópica si se compara el principio del entrenamiento con su final. Por los beneficios obtenidos y su bajo costo creemos<br />
que será útil su implementación para acercar dicha técnica a todos los neurocirujanos que se encuentren interesados en ella.]]></dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:tableOfContents><![CDATA[Introduction: To analyze the impact of training in a low-cost simulation station of exoscopy, used by residents of neurosurgery.<br />
Materials and methods: Six residents of neurosurgery were recruited, all of them having no previous experience in the use<br />
of the exoscope. An exoscopy simulation station, including a computer, a webcam and a light source, was developed. All<br />
the participants performed an introductory tutorial, an initial exercise of 5 sutures (each suture was classified as correct and<br />
incorrect), evaluating the time to complete this exercise and the efficacy (defined as the relation between correct sutures and<br />
the total). Posteriorly, 3 training sessions of 1 hour and a final evaluation with the same characteristics as the initial one were<br />
performed by all the participants. Both evaluations were studied by a senior neurosurgeon who gave individualized punctuation<br />
and feedback to the participant.<br />
Results: The average time of the initial exercise was 31 minutes 59 seconds, with an average efficiency of 70%. After training,<br />
the average time was 18 minutes, 12 seconds, with an efficiency of 80%.<br />
Conclusion: The simulator training demonstrated the improvement of the exoscopic technique of the evaluated residents.<br />
Because of the benefits that were observed, and also its low cost, we believe that the implementation of this device will be<br />
useful to all neurosurgeons interested in this technique.]]></dcterms:tableOfContents>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ezequiel Yasuda]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[ Federico Minghinelli]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Daniela Renedo]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Pablo Devoto]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[ Lucas Pina]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ana Lovaglio]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:dateAccepted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateAccepted>
    <dcterms:dateSubmitted><![CDATA[Agosto 2019]]></dcterms:dateSubmitted>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[1. Birch K, Drazin D, Black KL, Williams J, Berci G, Mamelak AN.<br />
Clinical experience with a high definition exoscope system for<br />
surgery of pineal region lesions. J Clin Neurosci 2014;21:1245-1249.<br />
2. Bohm PE, Arnold PM. Simulation and resident education in<br />
spinal neurosurgery. Surg Neurol Int 2015;6:33.doi:10.4103/2152-<br />
7806.152146.<br />
3. Chan AC, Chung SC, Yim AP, et al. Comparison of twodimensional<br />
vs threedimensional camera systems in laparoscopic<br />
surgery. Surg Endosc 1997;11:438–40<br />
4. Choque-Velasquez J, Colasanti R, Collan J, Kinnunen R, Rezai<br />
Jahromi B, Hernesniemi J. Virtual Reality Glasses and “Eye-Hands<br />
Blind Technique” for Microsurgical Training in Neurosurgery. World<br />
Neurosurgery 2018;112, 126–130.doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.067<br />
5. Di Ieva A, Komatsu M, Komatsu F, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic<br />
telovelar approach to the fourth ventricle: anatomic study. Neurosurg<br />
Rev 2012;35:341-348.<br />
6. Kassam AB, Engh JA, Mintz AH, Prevedello DM. Completely<br />
endoscopic resection of intraparenchymal brain tumors. Journal of<br />
Neurosurgery 2009;110(1), 116–123. doi:10.3171/2008.7.jns08226.<br />
7. Kirkman M A, Ahmed M, Albert AF, Wilson MH, Nandi D,<br />
Sevdalis N. The use of simulation in neurosurgical education<br />
and training. Journal of Neurosurgery 2014;121(2), 228–46.<br />
doi:10.3171/2014.5.jns131766.<br />
8. Klinger DR, Reinard KA, Ajayi OO, Delashaw JB.Microsurgical<br />
clipping of an anterior communicating artery aneurysm using a<br />
novel robotic visualization tool in lieu of the binocular operating<br />
microscope: operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)<br />
2018;14:26-28.<br />
9. Kshettry VR, Mullin J P, Schlenk R, Recinos PF, Benzel EC. The<br />
Role of Laboratory Dissection Training in Neurosurgical Residency:<br />
Results of a National Survey. World Neurosurgery 2014;82(5), 554–<br />
9.doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2014.05.028.<br />
10. Mamelak AN, Danielpour M, Black KL, Hagike M, Berci GA.<br />
High-Definition Exoscope System for Neurosurgery and Other<br />
Microsurgical Disciplines: Preliminary Report. Surgical Innovation<br />
2008;15(1), 38–46.doi:10.1177/1553350608315954.<br />
11. Mamelak AN, Drazin D, Shirzadi A, Black KL, Berci G.<br />
Infratentorial supracerebellar resection of a pineal tumor using a<br />
high definition video exoscope (VITOM). J Clin Neurosci 2012;19:<br />
306-309.<br />
12. Michli EE, Parra RO. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial<br />
nephrectomy: initial clinical experience. Urology 2009;73:302–5.<br />
13. Moisi MD, Hoang K, Tubbs RS, et al. Advancement of surgical<br />
visualization methods: comparison study between traditional<br />
microscopic surgery and a novel robotic optoelectronic visualization<br />
tool for spinal surgery. World Neurosurg 2017;98: 273-7.<br />
14. Olabe J, Olabe J. Microsurgical training on an in vitro chicken<br />
wing infusion model. Surgical Neurology 2009;72(6), 695–9.<br />
doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2008.12.008.<br />
15. Oliveira Magaldi M, Nicolato A, Godinho JV, Santos M, Prosdocimi<br />
A, Malheiros JA, Nakaji P. Human Placenta Aneurysm Model for<br />
Training Neurosurgeons in Vascular Microsurgery. Neurosurgery<br />
2014;10, 592–601.doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000000553.<br />
16. Parihar V, Yadav YR, Kher Y, Ratre S, Sethi A, Sharma D. Learning<br />
neuroendoscopy with an exoscope system (video telescopic operating<br />
monitor): Early clinical results. Asian J Neurosurg 2016;11:421-6.<br />
17. Ricciardi L, Chaichana KL, Cardia A, Stifano V, Rossini Z, Olivi A,<br />
Sturiale CL. The exoscope in neurosurgery: an innovative “point of<br />
view”. A systematic review of the technical, surgical and educational<br />
aspects. World Neurosurg 2019;124:136-144.doi:10.1016/j.<br />
wneu.2018.12.202.<br />
18. Sarkiss CA, Philemond S, Lee J, Sobotka S, Holloway TD, Moore<br />
MM, Bederson JB. Neurosurgical Skills Assessment: Measuring<br />
Technical Proficiency in Neurosurgery Residents Through<br />
Intraoperative Video Evaluations. World Neurosurgery 2016;89,<br />
1–8.doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.052.<br />
124<br />
19. Shirzadi A, Mukherjee D, Drazin DG, et al. Use of the video<br />
telescope operating monitor (VITOM) as an alternative to the<br />
operating microscope in spine surgery. Spine 2012;37:E1517-1523.<br />
20. Tabaee A, Anand VK, Fraser JF, Brown SM, Singh A,<br />
Schwartz TH. Three-dimensional endoscopic pituitary surgery.<br />
Operative Neurosurgery 2009; 64,288–295.doi:10.1227/01.<br />
neu.0000338069.51023.3c.<br />
21. Uluç K, Kujoth GC, Başkaya MK. Operating microscopes: past,<br />
present, and future. Neurosurgical Focus 2009; 27(3), E4.doi:10.31<br />
71/2009.6.focus09120.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://aanc.org.ar/ranc/items/show/1292">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Introducción a la Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Novedades Editoriales]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Juan José Mezzadri]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Javier Goland]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[ Mariano Socolovsky]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Álvaro Campero]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Diciembre 2019]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[Asociación Argentina de Neurocirugía]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[Español]]></dcterms:language>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
